diff --git a/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/web-haptics b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/web-haptics
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..75bbb9a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/web-haptics
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+---
+name: Web Haptics
+about: new issue
+title: "[Web Haptics]
"
+labels: Web Haptics
+assignees: liminzhu
+---
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/Haptics/explainer.md b/Haptics/explainer.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e724fc7c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Haptics/explainer.md
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+# Web Haptics API
+
+Authors: [Nesh Gandhe](https://github.com/neshgandhe_microsoft), [Limin Zhu](https://github.com/liminzhu)
+
+## Status of this Document
+
+This document is a starting point for engaging the community and standards bodies in developing collaborative solutions fit for standardization. The API is in the early ideation and interest-gauging stage, and the solution/design will likely evolve over time.
+
+* This document status: **Active**
+* Expected venue: [W3C Web Incubator Community Group](https://wicg.io/)
+* Current version: **This document**
+
+## Table of Contents
+1. [Introduction](#introduction)
+1. [User-Facing Problem](#user-facing-problem)
+1. [Goals](#goals)
+1. [Non-goals](#non-goals)
+1. [Proposed Approach](#proposed-approach)
+1. [Sample code](#sample-code)
+1. [Alternatives Considered](#alternatives-considered)
+1. [Accessibility, Internationalization, Privacy, and Security Considerations](#accessibility-internationalization-privacy-and-security-considerations)
+1. [Reference for Relevant Haptics APIs](#reference-for-relevant-haptics-apis)
+1. [Open Questions](#open-questions)
+1. [Stakeholder Feedback / Opposition](#stakeholder-feedback--opposition)
+1. [References & Acknowledgements](#references--acknowledgements)
+
+## Introduction
+
+Modern operating systems have embraced haptics as a core part of user experience — providing subtle, low-latency tactile cues that reinforce visual and auditory feedback. These signals improve confidence, precision, and delight in everyday interactions. The Web Haptics API proposes a semantic, cross-platform interface that connects web applications to native haptic capabilities. By focusing on intent-driven effects, the API enables web apps to deliver tactile feedback consistent with OS design principles and native experiences, while preserving and protecting user privacy and security.
+
+An example scenario this proposal aims to support is dragging elements/windows to a snap point. This will enable a much more engaging and satisfying experience for end users.
+
+## User-Facing Problem
+The [navigator.vibrate()](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Navigator/vibrate) API exists today to allow basic or developer-defined-patterned haptics. However, the current API is mobile-centric and lacks engine and device support. It is also coarse-grained and requires the developer to manually program the pattern which can be very confusing.
+
+## Goals
+
+- Bring standardized, semantic haptic feedback to web apps across desktop and mobile platforms.
+- Allow developers to signal intent/effect rather than programming raw patterns.
+- Focus on reactive haptics feedback (i.e. haptics immediately after user input).
+- Extensible interface for future haptics advancement on the web.
+- Respect platform haptics user settings if available.
+- Minimize privacy/fingerprinting concerns.
+
+## Non-goals
+
+- Guarantee identical tactile output across platforms - different platforms and user agents may choose varied output that best matches the intent.
+- Cover haptics notification scenarios (e.g. vibrate to alert users when long-running task is completed).
+- Cover/replace API for highly specialized hardware, namely gamepad.
+
+## Proposed Approach
+
+The Web Haptics API uses a pre-defined list of effects with an optional intensity parameter, without exposing raw waveform authoring or low-level parameters like duration, sharpness, or ramp. Developers request a named effect, and the user agent maps it to the closest native capability (which may be a generic pattern if OS or hardware support is lacking). In order to minimize fingerprinting risks, the API does not currently allow developers to query haptics-capable hardware or available waveforms. Instead, haptics will be sent to the last input device if haptics-capable. The API is not gated behind permission but requires [sticky user activation](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/User_activation).
+
+```js
+navigator.playHaptics(effect, intensity);
+```
+
+The parameters for `navigator.playHaptics`:
+- effect: a pre-defined set of waveform effects (which can be extended in the future) that includes -
+ - Hover: a light, subtle cue that signals something is interactive or an action may follow.
+ - Edge: a heavy boundary signal that indicates reaching the end of a range or hitting a limit.
+ - Tick: a firm, pulse that marks discrete changes, like moving through a list or slider.
+ - Align: a crisp confirmation when an object locks into place or aligns with guides or edges.
+ - Optional: a dynamic pulse that conveys motion, transitions, or intelligent system activity.
+- intensity: a normalized intensity value between 0.0 and 1.0. Note that if platform intensity setting is available, then effective intensity = system intensity value * developer specified intensity. Intensity defaults to 1 if left unspecified.
+
+The API always returns `undefined`. No haptics is played if the last input device is not haptics-capable.
+
+## Sample code
+```html
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+```
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+Given this is an early brainstorming explainer, the API shape is very much open to change and we welcome feedback to ask us to revisit below and other alternatives.
+
+- Extending existing `navigator.vibrate`
+ - Pros: No newly introduced interface.
+ - Cons: Extending it would impose design limitation because of interop (even though it has limited support) and also hinder feature detection.
+
+- A pointer-event based API as previously defined in [explainer](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/HapticsDevice/explainer.md)
+ - Pros: Closely tie haptics to input events.
+ - Cons: Can be more cumbersome than a declarative method.
+
+## Accessibility, Internationalization, Privacy, and Security Considerations
+
+### Privacy
+The current design does not expose means to query haptics-capable devices, available waveforms/effects, or success in playing haptics.
+
+### Security
+The current design does not include permission gate for haptics but requires [sticky user activation](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Security/User_activation). While there is potential concern for haptics abuse, this is manageable given -
+
+- User may choose to navigate away and there is no lasting impact on the user,
+- User agent may choose to apply additional throttle.
+
+## Reference for relevant haptics APIs
+
+This section provides reference to existing web and native haptics API to help inform the API design and platform supportability.
+
+Known platform-specific native haptics API:
+
+- [Windows: InputHapticsManager](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/uwp/api/windows.devices.haptics?view=winrt-26100)
+- [macOS: NSHapticFeedbackManager](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/appkit/nshapticfeedbackmanager)
+- [iOS: Core Haptics](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/corehaptics)
+- [Android: VibrationEffect](https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/VibrationEffect)
+
+Relevant web APIs:
+- [navigator.vibrate](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Navigator/vibrate)
+
+## Open Questions
+
+- Feedback on the set of predefined waveforms and how well they can be implemented on different platforms.
+- Are there scenarios where developer may want to add delayed haptics effect?
+- Should this API return whether haptics is successfully played as opposed?
+- Is there developer interest on haptics device enumeration and whether this can be done in a way with minimum fingerprinting concern?
+- While currently out of scope, is the developer interest level for haptics notifications scenarios?
+
+## Stakeholder Feedback / Opposition
+
+We have heard some early developer interest such as [dragging divider to a snap point in Slack](https://github.com/w3c/webappswg/issues/138#issuecomment-3514522699).
+
+We intend to seek feedback via:
+
+- Incubation in WICG.
+- Discuss within Device & Sensors Working Group.
+- Cross‑share with Haptic Industry Forum (non‑standards venue) to align on primitives vocabulary and invite suppliers/OEMs to comment publicly in WICG issues.
+
+## References & acknowledgements
+
+We acknowledge that this design will change and improve through input from browser vendors, standards bodies, accessibility advocates, and developers. Ongoing collaboration is essential to ensure the API meets diverse needs.
+
+We only get here through the contributions of many—thank you to everyone who shares feedback and helps shape this work. Special thanks to:
+- Ross Nichols – Contributions to Windows Haptics API design and integration guidance.
+- Previous Iteration – [HapticsDevice Explainer (Microsoft Edge)](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/HapticsDevice/explainer.md), which served as the foundation for this proposal.
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index d53048b5..d5d43e64 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ These are proposals that are still really early in their lifecycle. We might jus
| [Delayed Messages API](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/DelayedMessages/explainer.md) |  | [New Issue...](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/issues/new?assignees=joone&labels=DelayedMessages&title=%5BDelayedMessages%5D+%3CTITLE+HERE%3E) | Web Perf |
| [Back to Opener: Seamless Back Navigation in New Tabs](BackToOpener/explainer.md) |  | [New Issue...](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/issues/new?assignees=victorhuangwq&labels=BackToOpener&title=%5BBackToOpener%5D+%3CTITLE+HERE%3E) | WHATWG |
| [Drag Multiple Virtual Files Out of Browser](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/DownloadURL/explainer.md) |  | [New Issue...](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/issues/new?assignees=joone&labels=DownloadURL&title=%5BDownloadURL%5D+%3CTITLE+HERE%3E) | N/A |
+| [Web Haptics](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/haptics/explainer.md) |  | [New Issue...](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/issues/new?template=web-haptics.md) | Device |
# Alumni 🎓