Skip to content

Commit 57faba2

Browse files
authored
Update agglayer.md - fixing minor typos
Update agglayer.md - fixing minor typos
1 parent 1574045 commit 57faba2

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

docs/learn/agglayer.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Reliance on bridging in order to connect what are essentially isolated networks,
2222

2323
Let's take a deeper look at cross-chain transfers.
2424

25-
First of all, we understand execution of atomic cross-chain transactions to mean that, with every set of transactions a user submits to multiple chains, the user has the guarantee that either all transactions are execute successfully or none of them is included in any chain.[^1]
25+
First of all, we understand execution of atomic cross-chain transactions to mean that, with every set of transactions a user submits to multiple chains, the user has the guarantee that either all transactions are executed successfully or none of them is included in any chain.[^1]
2626

2727
Consider the following example as a typical cross-chain transfer.
2828

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ There's a subtle detail about validiums that needs to be noted.
9797

9898
For all rollup chains, we have all data necessary to retrieve the proof of inclusion for a particular message in some list $M_i$.
9999

100-
But this is not so validium chains. For instance, there could be a 'data withholding' attack.
100+
But this is not so with validium chains. For instance, there could be a 'data withholding' attack.
101101

102102
So we need to ensure that 'data withholding' attacks do no affect validium users' ability to process an exit or message from a rollup.
103103

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)