-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
Add search action for spotify #18791 #19358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 2 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughAdds a new Spotify "Search" action and supporting constant, exposes a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User as Action (Search)
participant App as Spotify App
participant API as Spotify API
User->>App: call this.spotify.search({ q, type, market, limit, offset, include_external })
App->>API: GET /search?q=...&type=...&market=...&limit=...&offset=...&include_external=...
API-->>App: 200 OK (search results)
App-->>User: returns results
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20–30 minutes
Suggested labels
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (19)
🧰 Additional context used🧠 Learnings (1)📚 Learning: 2025-10-20T01:01:02.970ZApplied to files:
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
🔇 Additional comments (23)
Comment |
|
Related with #18791 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
components/spotify/actions/search/search.mjs(1 hunks)components/spotify/consts.mjs(1 hunks)components/spotify/package.json(1 hunks)components/spotify/spotify.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-10-20T00:28:38.772Z
Learnt from: js07
Repo: PipedreamHQ/pipedream PR: 18744
File: components/slack/slack.app.mjs:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-20T00:28:38.772Z
Learning: In components/slack/slack.app.mjs, the assistantSearch method uses sdk().apiCall() directly instead of makeRequest because the slack/web-api npm package doesn't expose assistant.search.context as a method on WebClient. This direct usage is intentional and necessary when Slack API methods are not yet exposed in the SDK.
Applied to files:
components/spotify/spotify.app.mjs
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
components/spotify/actions/search/search.mjs (2)
components/spotify/consts.mjs (4)
ITEM_TYPES_LIST(10-35)ITEM_TYPES_LIST(10-35)ITEM_TYPES(1-8)ITEM_TYPES(1-8)components/spotify/spotify.app.mjs (6)
res(343-343)res(361-361)res(365-365)res(369-369)res(373-373)res(378-378)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/spotify/package.json (1)
3-3: Version bump aligns with new functionalityPackage version increment to
0.7.4is consistent with the addition of a new action and app method; no issues found.components/spotify/consts.mjs (1)
10-35: ITEM_TYPES_LIST is consistent and avoids string duplicationThe new
ITEM_TYPES_LISTcleanly reusesITEM_TYPESvalues and provides clear labels for all supported item types; this should work well as a shared options source.components/spotify/spotify.app.mjs (1)
389-392: search() wrapper is consistent with existing app methodsThe new
search(params)method follows the same_makeRequest+{ data }pattern as other helpers (e.g.,getGenres,getRecommendations), and is an appropriate low-level wrapper for the action to consume.
GTFalcao
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
|
Hi everyone, all test cases are passed! Ready for release! Test reports
|
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.