add missing 'not' in one Rcpp-FAQ sentence

also add pending update to lintian override

Author: eddelbuettel

debian/r-cran-rcpp.lintian-overrides

@@ -82,3 +82,4 @@ r-cran-rcpp: script-not-executable usr/lib/R/site-library/Rcpp/unitTests/runit.I
 r-cran-rcpp: script-not-executable usr/lib/R/site-library/Rcpp/unitTests/runit.InternalFunctionCPP11.R
 r-cran-rcpp: script-not-executable usr/lib/R/site-library/Rcpp/unitTests/runit.binary.package.R
 r-cran-rcpp: script-not-executable usr/lib/R/site-library/Rcpp/unitTests/runit.sugar.var.R
+r-cran-rcpp: script-not-executable usr/lib/R/site-library/Rcpp/unitTests/runit.algorithm.R

vignettes/Rcpp-FAQ.Rnw

@@ -607,8 +607,8 @@ But for most packages using \pkg{Rcpp}, only two things are required:
   instantiated, for example \code{importFrom(Rcpp, evalCpp)}.
 \end{itemize}
 
-The name of the symbol does really matter; once one symbol is imported all
-should be available.
+The name of the symbol does not really matter; once one symbol is imported all
+symbols should be available.
 
 \subsection{I am having problems building RcppArmadillo on OS X, any help ?}
 \label{q:OSXArma}