Skip to content

Improve the existing TimSort implementation #16061

Improve the existing TimSort implementation

Improve the existing TimSort implementation #16061

Triggered via pull request October 25, 2025 23:54
Status Failure
Total duration 18s
Artifacts

ruff.yml

on: pull_request
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

10 errors
Ruff (UP047): sorts/tim_sort.py#L64
sorts/tim_sort.py:64:5: UP047 Generic function `tim_sort` should use type parameters
Ruff (UP006): sorts/tim_sort.py#L43
sorts/tim_sort.py:43:45: UP006 Use `list` instead of `List` for type annotation
Ruff (UP006): sorts/tim_sort.py#L43
sorts/tim_sort.py:43:33: UP006 Use `list` instead of `List` for type annotation
Ruff (UP006): sorts/tim_sort.py#L43
sorts/tim_sort.py:43:17: UP006 Use `list` instead of `List` for type annotation
Ruff (RUF005): sorts/tim_sort.py#L39
sorts/tim_sort.py:39:18: RUF005 Consider `[*arr[:j], key, *arr[j:i], *arr[i + 1:]]` instead of concatenation
Ruff (UP006): sorts/tim_sort.py#L29
sorts/tim_sort.py:29:37: UP006 Use `list` instead of `List` for type annotation
Ruff (UP006): sorts/tim_sort.py#L29
sorts/tim_sort.py:29:25: UP006 Use `list` instead of `List` for type annotation
Ruff (UP047): sorts/tim_sort.py#L29
sorts/tim_sort.py:29:5: UP047 Generic function `insertion_sort` should use type parameters
Ruff (UP006): sorts/tim_sort.py#L6
sorts/tim_sort.py:6:24: UP006 Use `list` instead of `List` for type annotation
Ruff (UP035): sorts/tim_sort.py#L1
sorts/tim_sort.py:1:1: UP035 `typing.List` is deprecated, use `list` instead