Fix validation test to handle both passing and failing validation

Co-authored-by: abraham <3341+abraham@users.noreply.github.com>

Author: Copilot

src/__tests__/generators/UtilityHelpers.test.ts

@@ -101,7 +101,9 @@ describe('UtilityHelpers', () => {
       expect(utilityHelpers.sanitizeSchemaName('Admin_Account')).toBe(
         'AdminAccount'
       );
-      expect(utilityHelpers.sanitizeSchemaName('Poll_Option')).toBe('PollOption');
+      expect(utilityHelpers.sanitizeSchemaName('Poll_Option')).toBe(
+        'PollOption'
+      );
       expect(utilityHelpers.sanitizeSchemaName('Status_Mention')).toBe(
         'StatusMention'
       );
@@ -114,9 +116,9 @@ describe('UtilityHelpers', () => {
       expect(utilityHelpers.sanitizeSchemaName('Admin::Account_Setting')).toBe(
         'AdminAccountSetting'
       );
-      expect(utilityHelpers.sanitizeSchemaName('Admin::CanonicalEmailBlock')).toBe(
-        'AdminCanonicalEmailBlock'
-      );
+      expect(
+        utilityHelpers.sanitizeSchemaName('Admin::CanonicalEmailBlock')
+      ).toBe('AdminCanonicalEmailBlock');
     });
 
     it('should preserve already PascalCase names', () => {

src/__tests__/validate.test.ts

@@ -32,10 +32,13 @@ describe('OpenAPI Schema Validation', () => {
     // But we just want to test that the script runs without throwing
     expect(() => {
       try {
-        execSync('npm run validate', {
+        const result = execSync('npm run validate', {
           cwd: path.join(__dirname, '..', '..'),
           stdio: 'pipe',
         });
+        // If validation passes, check for success message
+        const output = result.toString();
+        expect(output).toMatch(/valid|Woohoo/);
       } catch (error: any) {
         // Expect the command to exit with code 1 due to validation errors
         // but that's okay - we just want to ensure the script runs