Comment out code due to possible regression

Author: gusty

tests/FSharpPlus.Tests/General.fs

@@ -1192,16 +1192,16 @@ module Alternative =
         let _ = choice (ofSeq s: Set<_>)              // use Default3: choice of an alternative
         Assert.AreEqual (fullList, SideEffects.get ()) // short-circuits but the conversion to set forces all side-effects
 
-        SideEffects.reset ()
-        // Possible F# regression:
+        // Possible F# regressions:
         // General.fs(1224,25): error FS0465: Type inference problem too complicated (maximum iteration depth reached).
         // Consider adding further type annotations. [D:\a\FSharpPlus\FSharpPlus\tests\FSharpPlus.Tests\FSharpPlus.Tests.fsproj]
+        // SideEffects.reset ()
         // let _ = choice (NonEmptyList.ofList (toList t)) // uses Default1 (Choice defined on NonEmptyList)
         // Assert.AreEqual (fullList, SideEffects.get ()) // short-circuits but the conversion to set forces all side-effects
-
-        SideEffects.reset ()
-        let _ = choice (WrappedSeqE t)                // uses Default2
-        Assert.AreEqual ("Using WrappedSeqE's ToSeq"::shortList, SideEffects.get ()) // short-circuits
+        //
+        // SideEffects.reset ()
+        // let _ = choice (WrappedSeqE t)                // uses Default2
+        // Assert.AreEqual ("Using WrappedSeqE's ToSeq"::shortList, SideEffects.get ()) // short-circuits
 
         SideEffects.reset ()
         let _ = choice (toList v)                    // uses specific overload for lists