Commit 2a6000c
committed
C++: getter/setter performance in StructLikeClass
The predicates `getter` and `setter` in `StructLikeClass.qll` were very
slow on some snapshots. On https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr they had
this performance:
StructLikeClass::getter#fff#antijoin_rhs ........... 3m55s
Variable::Variable::getAnAssignedValue_dispred#bb .. 3m36s
StructLikeClass::setter#fff#antijoin_rhs ........... 20.5s
The `getAnAssignedValue_dispred` predicate in the middle was slow due to
magic propagated from `setter`.
With this commit, performance is instead:
StructLikeClass::getter#fff#antijoin_rhs ........... 497ms
Variable::Variable::getAnAssignedValue_dispred#ff .. 617ms
StructLikeClass::setter#fff#antijoin_rhs ........... 158ms
Instead of hand-optimizing the QL for performance, I simplified `setter`
and `getter` to require slightly stronger conditions. Previously, a
function was only considered a setter if it had no writes to other
fields on the same class. That requirement is now relaxed by dropping
the "on the same class" part. I made the corresponding change for what
defines a getter. I think that still captures the spirit of what getters
and setters are.
I also changed the double-negation with `exists` into a `forall`.1 parent 5ad0b39 commit 2a6000c
1 file changed
+8
-8
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
53 | 53 | | |
54 | 54 | | |
55 | 55 | | |
56 | | - | |
57 | | - | |
58 | | - | |
59 | | - | |
| 56 | + | |
| 57 | + | |
| 58 | + | |
| 59 | + | |
60 | 60 | | |
61 | 61 | | |
62 | 62 | | |
| |||
71 | 71 | | |
72 | 72 | | |
73 | 73 | | |
74 | | - | |
75 | | - | |
76 | | - | |
77 | | - | |
| 74 | + | |
| 75 | + | |
| 76 | + | |
| 77 | + | |
78 | 78 | | |
79 | 79 | | |
80 | 80 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments