Update draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

Co-authored-by: Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@linaro.org>

Author: henkbirkholz

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

@@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ Analogously, a general overview about the information elements typically used by
 Remote ATtestation procedureS (RATS, {{-RATS}}) are workflows composed of roles and interactions, in which Verifiers create Attestation Results about the trustworthiness of an Attester's system component characteristics.
 Verifier's generate assessments in the form of Attestation Results that are based on Endorsements, Reference Values, Appraisal Policies, and Evidence -- trustable and tamper-evident Claims Sets about an Attester's system component characteristics.
 The roles *Attester* and *Verifier*, as well as the Conceptual Messages *Evidence* and *Attestation Results* are concepts defined by the RATS Architecture {{-RATS}}.
-This document illustrates three main interaction models between various RATS roles, namely Attesters, Verifiers, and Relying Parties that can be used in specific RATS-related specifications. Using Evidence as a prominent example these three interaction models are:
+ This document illustrates three main interaction models between various RATS roles, namely Attesters, Verifiers, and Relying Parties that can be used in specific RATS-related specifications.
+ Using Evidence as a prominent example, these three interaction models are:
 
 1. *Challenge/Response Remote Attestation*:
    A Verifier actively challenges an Attester and receives time-fresh Evidence in response.