Skip to content

Commit 36c3166

Browse files
committed
[minimcp] Add comprehensive documentation
- Add README.md with complete MiniMCP guide and API reference - Add TESTING.md with testing documentation - Document architecture, examples, and troubleshooting
1 parent 30e2b76 commit 36c3166

File tree

6 files changed

+1401
-86
lines changed

6 files changed

+1401
-86
lines changed

benchmarks/minimcp/reports/MINIMCP_VS_FASTMCP_ANALYSIS.md

Lines changed: 9 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
22

33
After analyzing all 6 benchmark results across different transports and workload patterns, here's the clear verdict:
44

5-
### 🏆 Overall Winner: MiniMCP
5+
## Overall Winner
6+
7+
### 🏆 MiniMCP
68

79
**MiniMCP consistently outperforms FastMCP across all transport types and workloads.**
810

@@ -47,24 +49,28 @@ After analyzing all 6 benchmark results across different transports and workload
4749
| | | Heavy Load Throughput | **153% higher** (388 vs 153 RPS) |
4850

4951
**Key Highlights:**
52+
5053
- 🔥 **STDIO Async**: MiniMCP shines brightest with 34% faster response times and 23% higher throughput under heavy load
5154
- 🚀 **HTTP Transports**: MiniMCP dramatically outperforms with up to 173% higher throughput under heavy load
5255

5356
## 📊 Summary Statistics
5457

5558
### Response Time Improvements (MiniMCP vs FastMCP)
59+
5660
- **Sequential Load**: 5-42% faster
5761
- **Light Load**: 16-48% faster
5862
- **Medium Load**: 22-34% faster
5963
- **Heavy Load**: 23-67% faster
6064

6165
### Throughput Improvements (MiniMCP vs FastMCP)
66+
6267
- **Sequential Load**: 2-74% higher
6368
- **Light Load**: 2-55% higher
6469
- **Medium Load**: 4-30% higher
6570
- **Heavy Load**: 4-173% higher
6671

6772
### Max Memory Efficiency (MiniMCP vs FastMCP)
73+
6874
- **STDIO Transport**: 17-21% lower memory usage under heavy load
6975
- **HTTP Transport**: 27-28% lower memory usage under heavy load
7076
- **Streamable HTTP Transport**: 27-28% lower memory usage under heavy load
@@ -73,6 +79,7 @@ After analyzing all 6 benchmark results across different transports and workload
7379
## 🏁 Conclusion
7480

7581
**🏆 MiniMCP is the clear winner** for production workloads, offering:
82+
7683
-**Faster response times** (20-67% improvement)
7784
-**Higher throughput** (10-173% improvement)
7885
-**Better scalability** under heavy load
@@ -112,5 +119,4 @@ After analyzing all 6 benchmark results across different transports and workload
112119

113120
---
114121

115-
*Generated from benchmark results on December 10th, 2025 by Claude 4.5 Sonnet*
116-
122+
Generated from benchmark results on December 10th, 2025 by Claude 4.5 Sonnet

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)