Skip to content

[Multi-provider] Reconsider type of "originalMetadata" #1792

@toddbaert

Description

@toddbaert

For now I kept originalMetadata as Map<String, Metadata> to match how buildProviders currently treats provider names as keys.
I agree a List<KeyValuePair<String, Metadata>> could better represent duplicate names; happy to open a follow-up issue to discuss that representation and adjust the metadata type there if we decide to support duplicates fully.

Originally posted by @Vishalup29 in #1765 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions