You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Change is rarely met with uniform enthusiasm. When a new idea, process, or direction is introduced, people filter it through two dimensions: understanding and agreement. Together, these form a kind of quadrant that explains why some people lean in, some resist, and others quietly comply.
The Four Quadrants
Agree 💬
Disagree 🚫
Understand 🧠
Aligned Partners — They get the “why” and support the “what.” These people become advocates, helping others see the vision more clearly.
Principled Skeptics — They understand the rationale but disagree with the direction. Their dissent can be invaluable if engaged with respect, as it often surfaces blind spots or untested assumptions.
Don’t Understand ❓
Blind Supporters — They trust the source or follow the flow without fully grasping the reasoning. While helpful in the short term, this lack of comprehension can lead to fragility later, especially when challenges arise.
Resisters — The toughest group to reach. They neither understand nor agree, often due to unclear communication, past negative experiences, or cognitive overload.
Moving People Clockwise
The goal in any change effort is not to force compliance but to move people clockwise through the quadrants — from Resister → Blind Supporter → Aligned Partner.
Resisters → Blind Supporters: Start by clarifying intent. Remove ambiguity. Make it safe to ask questions. Understanding often begins when people feel heard.
Blind Supporters → Aligned Partners: Deepen context. Share the reasoning, the trade-offs, and the long-term vision. Alignment grows from shared comprehension.
Principled Skeptics → Aligned Partners: Engage in dialogue, not debate. Their disagreement is often a sign of deep care. Listening with humility can transform critics into co-owners.
The Real Challenge
The hardest quadrant to work with is the resisters — those who don’t understand and don’t agree. But the most dangerous may actually be the blind supporters — those who agree without understanding. Their support is conditional, built on trust or convenience, not conviction.
Closing Thought
Leading change isn’t just about persuasion. It’s about clarity, empathy, and engagement. People don’t resist change itself; they resist feeling unseen, unheard, or uninformed. When we invest in understanding before agreement, we turn compliance into commitment.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Change is rarely met with uniform enthusiasm. When a new idea, process, or direction is introduced, people filter it through two dimensions: understanding and agreement. Together, these form a kind of quadrant that explains why some people lean in, some resist, and others quietly comply.
The Four Quadrants
Moving People Clockwise
The goal in any change effort is not to force compliance but to move people clockwise through the quadrants — from Resister → Blind Supporter → Aligned Partner.
The Real Challenge
The hardest quadrant to work with is the resisters — those who don’t understand and don’t agree. But the most dangerous may actually be the blind supporters — those who agree without understanding. Their support is conditional, built on trust or convenience, not conviction.
Closing Thought
Leading change isn’t just about persuasion. It’s about clarity, empathy, and engagement. People don’t resist change itself; they resist feeling unseen, unheard, or uninformed. When we invest in understanding before agreement, we turn compliance into commitment.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions