Markdown cell fix

Author: fonnesbeck

examples/case_studies/bayesian_workflow.ipynb

@@ -2107,19 +2107,8 @@
    ]
   },
   {
-   "cell_type": "code",
-   "execution_count": 44,
+   "cell_type": "markdown",
    "metadata": {},
-   "outputs": [
-    {
-     "ename": "SyntaxError",
-     "evalue": "invalid syntax (2886947069.py, line 1)",
-     "output_type": "error",
-     "traceback": [
-      "  \u001b[36mCell\u001b[39m\u001b[36m \u001b[39m\u001b[32mIn[44]\u001b[39m\u001b[32m, line 1\u001b[39m\n\u001b[31m    \u001b[39m\u001b[31m:::{include} ../page_footer.md\u001b[39m\n    ^\n\u001b[31mSyntaxError\u001b[39m\u001b[31m:\u001b[39m invalid syntax\n"
-     ]
-    }
-   ],
    "source": [
     ":::{include} ../page_footer.md\n",
     ":::"

examples/case_studies/bayesian_workflow.myst.md

@@ -645,8 +645,5 @@ As you can see, the model is not a great fit to this data. Why? What assumptions
 %watermark -n -u -v -iv -w
 ```
 
-```{code-cell} ipython3
-
 :::{include} ../page_footer.md
 :::
-```