@@ -230,16 +230,18 @@ The CPython :doc:`Extending and Embedding <python:extending/index>`
230230guide includes an introduction to writing a
231231:doc: `custom extension module in C <python:extending/extending >`.
232232
233- ::
233+ ..
234234
235- mention the stable ABI (3.2+, link to the CPython C API docs)
236- mention the module lifecycle
237- mention the challenges of shared static state and subinterpreters
238- mention the implications of the GIL for extension modules
239- mention the memory allocation APIs in 3.4+
235+ FIXME
236+
237+ * mention the stable ABI (3.2+, link to the CPython C API docs)
238+ * mention the module lifecycle
239+ * mention the challenges of shared static state and subinterpreters
240+ * mention the implications of the GIL for extension modules
241+ * mention the memory allocation APIs in 3.4+
240242
241- mention again that all this is one of the reasons why you probably
242- *don't* want to handcode your extension modules :)
243+ * mention again that all this is one of the reasons why you probably * don't *
244+ want to handcode your extension modules :)
243245
244246
245247Building binary extensions
@@ -311,16 +313,16 @@ Publishing binary extensions
311313For interim guidance on this topic, see the discussion in
312314:issue: `this issue <284> `.
313315
314- ::
316+ ..
315317
316318 FIXME
317319
318- cover publishing as wheel files on PyPI or a custom index server
319- cover creation of Windows and macOS installers
320- cover weak linking
321- mention the fact that Linux distros have a requirement to build from
322- source in their own build systems, so binary-only releases are strongly
323- discouraged
320+ * cover publishing as wheel files on PyPI or a custom index server
321+ * cover creation of Windows and macOS installers
322+ * cover weak linking
323+ * mention the fact that Linux distros have a requirement to build from
324+ source in their own build systems, so binary-only releases are strongly
325+ discouraged
324326
325327
326328Additional resources
0 commit comments