Data Accessor - Rainfields3 Mosiac#106
Data Accessor - Rainfields3 Mosiac#106tennlee merged 11 commits intoACCESS-Community-Hub:developfrom
Conversation
…real data since they are not available on public repo
…oj to better reflect the test; remove __init__
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 14896066608Details
💛 - Coveralls |
|
@tennlee tests seem to pass now - not sure why, but removing a I noted that some of the other sub-packages didn't have it so I figured I'd remove it and it worked. If there's a good reason for the import error. I'd be interested to understand. Especially since the error didn't show up anywhere in Also I did add |
|
RE: review - I just put a couple of notes for the reviewer on the description above - have a look through, other than the minor changes, its the same PR as in NCI gitlab. |
|
I suspect this has to do with pytest import modes: https://pytest.org/en/7.4.x/explanation/pythonpath.html#import-modes Hypothesis: with the default i.e. Regardless of precedence, we want the ability for package tests to have utility modules since they are in some instances easier to write and organise than fixtures. There are a few options to work around this, but its beyond the scope of this issue. |
|
Thanks. Code review performed, looks like a useful step forward. Very happy with the general coding quality. Notebook tested manually. I'll get a post-merge review from one of our radar experts to double check, but looks good to me. |
This is ported from the nci gitlab. Note that mainly "RadarDemo" has been renamed to "Rainfields3"
ISSUE: #107
RELATED PR: #95
Things to consider for reviewer:
import site_archive_nciis used to import the archive, whereas pyearthtools imports generally have theimport pyearthtools.data as ...format.Original notes:
Details