Conversation
WalkthroughVitest was upgraded from v3.2.4 to v4.0.7 and Node engine requirement raised from >=18.16.0 to >=20.0.0. A new migration plan document was added describing breaking changes, migration phases, coverage and mock adjustments, and validation steps. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/dev-notes/2025-11-07/bump-vitest-from-v3.x-to-v4.x/plan.md (1)
1-50: Documentation quality is excellent; structure and examples are well-organized.The migration guide comprehensively covers breaking changes (Node version, coverage config, mock API behavior), provides concrete code examples, and includes a detailed phase-based implementation checklist. The inclusion of lessons learned (lines 383–413) and test statistics (1640 tests passing) demonstrates thorough validation.
Suggestion: Consider creating a concise migration summary at the top (e.g., a 3–5 bullet summary) for developers who need a quick reference. This would complement the existing detailed sections.
Example addition after the table of contents (after line 17):
## 🚀 Quick Reference (TL;DR) - **Node requirement**: >=20.0.0 (was >=18.16.0) - **All Vitest packages**: Update to v4.0.7 - **Coverage config**: May need updates (removed `coverage.all`, `coverage.extensions`) - **Mock API**: `vi.restoreAllMocks()` now restores spies only; use `vi.clearAllMocks()` and `vi.resetAllMocks()` explicitly - **Breaking change risk**: Low for this project (existing tests all pass)This would make the guide more accessible to team members scanning quickly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/dev-notes/2025-11-07/bump-vitest-from-v3.x-to-v4.x/plan.md(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: preview
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/dev-notes/2025-11-07/bump-vitest-from-v3.x-to-v4.x/plan.md (1)
385-392: Retrospective analysis demonstrates low migration risk.The lessons learned section confirms that all 1640 existing tests passed with v4.0.7, coverage configuration did not require updates (deprecated options were not in use), and the team was already on Node v22—satisfying v4's >=20.0.0 requirement. This validates the upgrade safety.
close #2752
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Documentation