Skip to content

Conversation

@river0525
Copy link
Collaborator

@river0525 river0525 commented Dec 20, 2025

以下の箇所に追記を行いました
・README.md の 開発・運営メンバーと役割分担
・src/lib/constants/product-info.ts の members

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added a new contributor profile to the project documentation and constants, including planned contributions to the platform.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request adds a new contributor, river0525, to the project by including documentation in README.md and registering their member profile in the product info constants file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Adding new contributor entry
README.md, src/lib/constants/product-info.ts
Added contributor river0525 to README with role and planned contributions (commenting functionality, difficulty voting, problem difficulty evaluation); registered corresponding member entry in product info constants with name and X account link.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Additions are straightforward and follow established patterns in both files
  • No logic changes or structural modifications
  • Documentation and static data entry only

Poem

🐰 A new friend joins our rabbit warren,
River0525 comes forth to brighten the morrow!
Comments, votes, and problems they'll measure,
Our community's growth is a collaborative treasure! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title mentions adding 'river 0525' to 'menber' (member), which aligns with the PR's primary objective of adding a new contributor entry. However, it contains a typo ('menber' instead of 'member') and uses an emoji, making it less professional and clear.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/README

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1465908 and b1555bd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/lib/constants/product-info.ts (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: preview
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (1)

140-142: LGTM! Documentation entry is consistent and well-formatted.

The contributor documentation follows the established format, and the X account link correctly matches the entry in src/lib/constants/product-info.ts.

src/lib/constants/product-info.ts (1)

42-42: LGTM! New member entry added correctly.

The entry follows the established format with the X_BASE_URL constant and is consistently placed with other members.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Collaborator

@KATO-Hiro KATO-Hiro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

プルリクエストの作成していただき、ありがとうございます
LGTMです

マージさせていただきます

@KATO-Hiro KATO-Hiro merged commit 6c0defb into staging Dec 20, 2025
3 checks passed
@KATO-Hiro KATO-Hiro deleted the docs/README branch December 20, 2025 22:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants