Skip to content

[CODEOWNERS Data Quality] Fix up CODEOWNERS#44945

Open
danieljurek wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
djurek/fix-python-codeowners
Open

[CODEOWNERS Data Quality] Fix up CODEOWNERS#44945
danieljurek wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
djurek/fix-python-codeowners

Conversation

@danieljurek
Copy link
Member

Fix possible errors in CODEOWNERS data quality that do not obviously fit into the proposed data model. This will make automating importing/rendering of the data model easier.

@danieljurek danieljurek self-assigned this Jan 31, 2026
@danieljurek danieljurek requested a review from lmazuel as a code owner January 31, 2026 00:09
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 31, 2026 00:09
@danieljurek danieljurek requested review from a team, kashifkhan and xiangyan99 as code owners January 31, 2026 00:09
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR aims to fix data quality issues in the CODEOWNERS file to better align with a proposed data model for easier automation and rendering. The changes primarily focus on reorganizing entries, removing wildcards, adding consistent blank line separators, and adding label comments for better structure.

Changes:

  • Relocated the smoke tests entry from the end of the file to the core section (lines 28-30)
  • Replaced the wildcard /sdk/monitor/* entry with a specific /sdk/monitor/ directory entry
  • Added blank lines and label comments for improved consistency and separation between different SDK services (ML-Jobs, ML-AutoML, ML-ImportJob, Mixed Reality sections)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@danieljurek danieljurek moved this from 🤔 Triage to 🔬 Dev in PR in Azure SDK EngSys 📆🎇 Feb 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: 🔬 Dev in PR

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants