Skip to content

Conversation

@topologoanatom
Copy link

Related to #337. These changes fix behaviour described in #333.

@delta1
Copy link
Contributor

delta1 commented Jan 16, 2026

I think it would be great to add unit tests that repro #333 / #337 that pass with this change but fail without it

@topologoanatom
Copy link
Author

I think it would be great to add unit tests that repro #333 / #337 that pass with this change but fail without it

I’m currently unable to reproduce bug #333 except by using the full flow described in the issue above. Adding that script to a unit test is difficult, as it requires specific functionality from SimplicityHL

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants