Skip to content

Feedback#1

Open
github-classroom[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intofeedbackfrom
main
Open

Feedback#1
github-classroom[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intofeedbackfrom
main

Conversation

@github-classroom
Copy link

@github-classroom github-classroom bot commented Feb 4, 2026

👋! GitHub Classroom created this pull request as a place for your teacher to leave feedback on your work. It will update automatically. Don’t close or merge this pull request, unless you’re instructed to do so by your teacher.
In this pull request, your teacher can leave comments and feedback on your code. Click the Subscribe button to be notified if that happens.
Click the Files changed or Commits tab to see all of the changes pushed to the default branch since the assignment started. Your teacher can see this too.

Notes for teachers

Use this PR to leave feedback. Here are some tips:

  • Click the Files changed tab to see all of the changes pushed to the default branch since the assignment started. To leave comments on specific lines of code, put your cursor over a line of code and click the blue + (plus sign). To learn more about comments, read “Commenting on a pull request”.
  • Click the Commits tab to see the commits pushed to the default branch. Click a commit to see specific changes.
  • If you turned on autograding, then click the Checks tab to see the results.
  • This page is an overview. It shows commits, line comments, and general comments. You can leave a general comment below.
    For more information about this pull request, read “Leaving assignment feedback in GitHub”.

Subscribed: @Nedrick-Rondre

* @return The number of milliseconds equivalent to the given number of minutes.
*/
Integer MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = null; // Make this value a constant
Integer MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60000; // Make this value a constant

Check warning

Code scanning / PMD

Field declaration for 'MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE' should be before method declarations in its class Warning

Field declaration for 'MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE' should be before method declarations in its class
* @return The number of milliseconds equivalent to the given number of minutes.
*/
Integer MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = null; // Make this value a constant
Integer MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60000; // Make this value a constant

Check warning

Code scanning / PMD

The instance field name 'MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE' doesn't match '[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*' Warning

The instance field name 'MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE' doesn't match '[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*'
public static Double convertFahrenheitToCelsius(Double fahrenheit) {
final Double SUBTRACT_FACTOR = 32.0;
final Double MULTIPLY_FACTOR = 5.0;
final Double MULTIPLY_FACTOR = 5.0;

Check warning

Code scanning / PMD

The final local variable name 'MULTIPLY_FACTOR' doesn't match '[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*' Warning

The final local variable name 'MULTIPLY_FACTOR' doesn't match '[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*'
public static Double convertFahrenheitToCelsius(Double fahrenheit) {
final Double SUBTRACT_FACTOR = 32.0;
final Double MULTIPLY_FACTOR = 5.0;
final Double MULTIPLY_FACTOR = 5.0;

Check warning

Code scanning / regex

Found trailing whitespace at the end of a line of code. Warning

Found trailing whitespace at the end of a line of code.
Copy link

@walters954 walters954 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary for Nedrick

Hey Nedrick! Thanks for submitting your work on Module 1. I can see you've put in real effort here, and you're clearly starting to grasp the fundamentals of Apex programming. Let me share some feedback to help you level up!

What You Did Well

  • Order of Operations: Your solutions for adjustOrderOfOperations1, adjustOrderOfOperations2, and complexOrderOfOperations show a solid understanding of PEMDAS and how parentheses affect calculation order. Great work!
  • Boolean Logic: The isEven and isPositive methods are implemented correctly - you used the parameters directly and wrote clean, concise code.
  • Date Comparisons: Your isDateInPast and isDateTodayOrFuture methods correctly use Date.today() and proper comparison operators.
  • Formula Implementation: You correctly implemented the temperature conversion, paycheck calculations, and tax formulas.

Key Area to Improve

There's one important concept that needs adjustment throughout your code: using method parameters.

When a method is defined with parameters like public static Integer addition(Integer a, Integer b), the values a and b are provided by whoever calls your method. You should use these values directly, not replace them with hardcoded values.

Example of the issue:

public static Integer addition(Integer a, Integer b) {  
    Integer a = 4;   // This creates a NEW variable that hides the parameter
    Integer b = 16;  // This creates a NEW variable that hides the parameter
    return a + b;    // Always returns 20, ignoring what was passed in
}

The fix:

public static Integer addition(Integer a, Integer b) {  
    return a + b;  // Uses the actual values passed to the method
}

This pattern affects most of your methods. Once you remove those hardcoded variable declarations, your code should work correctly with the unit tests!

Next Steps

  1. Go through each method and remove the lines where you re-declare the parameter variables with hardcoded values
  2. Make sure you're using the original parameter names to perform your calculations
  3. Run the unit tests again to verify everything works

You're on the right track - this is a common learning moment when first working with methods and parameters. Keep up the great work, and feel free to reach out if you have questions!


Reviewer: Cloud Code Academy

return null; // Replace null with the variable you used to store the result
Integer a = 4;
Integer b = 16;
Integer sum = a + b;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job starting to work through these exercises! I can see you understand the core concepts of arithmetic operations and variable declarations.

However, there's one critical pattern I notice throughout your code that we need to address. When a method has parameters (like Integer a, Integer b here), those values are passed IN when someone calls your method. You should use those parameter values directly rather than declaring new variables with the same names and hardcoded values.

What's happening now:

public static Integer addition(Integer a, Integer b) {  
    Integer a = 4;  // This shadows the parameter 'a' with a new variable
    Integer b = 16; // This shadows the parameter 'b' with a new variable
    Integer sum = a + b;
    return sum; // Always returns 20, regardless of what's passed in
}

What it should be:

public static Integer addition(Integer a, Integer b) {  
    // Use the parameters directly - they already contain the values!
    Integer sum = a + b;
    return sum;
}

This way, when someone calls addition(5, 10), your method will correctly return 15 instead of always returning 20.

This same pattern applies to most of the other methods in this file. Once you fix this, your code should pass the unit tests!

*/
public static Boolean isEven(Integer num) {
return null; // Replace null with the variable you used to store the result
return Math.mod(num, 2) == 0; // Replace null with the variable you used to store the result

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent work on these two methods! You nailed it here by using the parameters directly instead of re-declaring them with hardcoded values.

isEven correctly uses Math.mod(num, 2) == 0 - this is exactly how you check if a number is even in Apex.

isPositive correctly uses num > 0 - simple and elegant!

This is the pattern you should apply to the other methods as well. Great job on these!

public static Boolean isDateInPast(Date dt) {
return null; // Replace null with the variable you used to store the result
Date today = Date.today();
Boolean isInPast = dt < today;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work on the date comparison logic! You correctly used Date.today() to get the current date and compared it properly.

Just remember to remove the hardcoded variable re-declarations in similar methods and use the dt parameter that's passed in - which you're already doing here correctly!

* @return The number of milliseconds equivalent to the given number of minutes.
*/
Integer MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = null; // Make this value a constant
Integer MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60000; // Make this value a constant

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good job defining the constant value! One small improvement: to make this a true constant in Apex, you should add the static final keywords:

static final Integer MILLISECONDS_PER_MINUTE = 60000;

The final keyword means the value cannot be changed after it's set, and static means it belongs to the class rather than an instance. This is a best practice for constants in Apex.

// You should add parentheses so that the result of the expression becomes 8.
Integer answer = 48 - 15 + 5 * 2;
return null; // Replace null with the variable you used to store the result
Integer answer = 48 - (15 + 5) * 2;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job on this one! You correctly added parentheses to change the order of operations from 48 - 15 + 5 * 2 = 43 to 48 - (15 + 5) * 2 = 8.

This shows a solid understanding of how parentheses affect the order of operations (PEMDAS). Well done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants