Skip to content

Conversation

@jwillemsen
Copy link
Member

@jwillemsen jwillemsen commented Jun 4, 2025

* common/parse_compiler_output.pm:
* make_pretty.pl:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved handling of Visual Studio 2022 informational messages to prevent them from being incorrectly flagged as errors or warnings. These messages are now displayed as normal text and excluded from error counts.

    * common/parse_compiler_output.pm:
    * make_pretty.pl:
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 4, 2025

Walkthrough

A specific informational message from Visual Studio 2022 about structured output formatting is now specially handled in two scripts. In one, the message is output as normal text and processing stops for that line; in the other, it is excluded from being treated as an error. No public interfaces were changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
common/parse_compiler_output.pm Added early check in output handler to recognize and specially output a Visual Studio 2022 info message.
make_pretty.pl Updated error detection logic to ignore the same Visual Studio 2022 informational message.

Poem

The bunny found a message, new and neat,
From Visual Studio, not an error to greet.
Now handled with care, it won’t cause alarm,
Just output as normal, no need for harm.
With filters in place, the logs stay sweet!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e6a74a and 664938b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • common/parse_compiler_output.pm (1 hunks)
  • make_pretty.pl (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
common/parse_compiler_output.pm (1)

158-162: LGTM! Well-implemented VS2022 message handling.

The change correctly identifies and handles the Visual Studio 2022 informational message by treating it as normal output and preventing it from being processed as an error or warning. The placement follows the established pattern of other compiler-specific message handlers in this method.

make_pretty.pl (1)

238-240: LGTM! Consistent implementation with parse_compiler_output.pm.

The change correctly prevents the VS2022 informational message from being classified as an error by returning 0. The regex pattern is identical to the one used in common/parse_compiler_output.pm, ensuring consistent handling across both scripts.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jwillemsen jwillemsen merged commit 16a2082 into DOCGroup:master Jun 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@jwillemsen jwillemsen deleted the jwi-vs2022 branch June 4, 2025 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants