feat(tracing): add bullmq integration and dsm support

[wconti27]

What does this PR do?

This PR was auto-generated by the APM AI Integration Toolkit and adds APM Tracing for the bullmq package.

Summary of Changes

• Adds tracing for Bullmq message production and consumption
• Supports both ESM / CJS code paths
• Adds context propagation, DSM, and peer service tagging

Motivation

Plugin Checklist

• Unit tests.
• Integration tests.
• Benchmarks.
• TypeScript definitions.
• TypeScript tests.
• API documentation.
• CI jobs/workflows.

Additional Notes

[github-actions]

Overall package size

Self size: 4.38 MB
Deduped: 5.21 MB
No deduping: 5.21 MB

Dependency sizes

| name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | import-in-the-middle | 2.0.0 | 68.46 kB | 797.03 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.10 | 26.73 kB | 26.73 kB |

_{🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 69.78%. Comparing base (d0cc613) to head (810ed85).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ages/datadog-instrumentations/src/helpers/hooks.js	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7123       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   84.54%   69.78%   -14.76%     
===========================================
  Files         529      285      -244     
  Lines       22542    10505    -12037     
===========================================
- Hits        19058     7331    -11727     
+ Misses       3484     3174      -310     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-01-08 17:33:10

Comparing candidate commit 810ed85 in PR branch conti/bullmq-auto-generated with baseline commit d0cc613 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 292 metrics, 28 unstable metrics.

[tlhunter]

Shouldn't there be a new Platform / instrumentation-bullmq (pull_request) action?

[wconti27]

Shouldn't there be a new Platform / instrumentation-bullmq (pull_request) action?

@tlhunter What is this? I'm not aware of what this is

[tlhunter]

@wconti27 What is this? I'm not aware of what this is

I was saying we need a new test to appear in the list of github actions that have executed as a result of this pull request. Such a test was not present when I reviewed previously but is now working.

[tlhunter]

Does BullMQ just stick JSON strings into Redis and we're adding a new field to it for context prop?

[wconti27]

yeah basically (as well as allowing just about any type)

[bengl]

@tlhunter The orchestrion configs look fine.