Skip to content

[DOCS-13410] Move processor shortcode content inline (Batch 3)#34610

Merged
maycmlee merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
may/move-processor-shortcodes-batch-3
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

[DOCS-13410] Move processor shortcode content inline (Batch 3)#34610
maycmlee merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
may/move-processor-shortcodes-batch-3

Conversation

@maycmlee
Copy link
Contributor

@maycmlee maycmlee commented Feb 13, 2026

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

Fixes DOCS-13410

No net new content. Just moving shortcode content into docs.

Changes made:

  • Moved shortcode content inline from layouts/shortcodes/observability_pipelines/processors/
  • Added Overview and Setup headers
  • Converted image syntax to img src shortcode

Processors updated:

  • sample
  • sensitive_data_scanner
  • split_array
  • tag_control/logs
  • throttle

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

Additional notes

This is part 3 of 3 batches to complete this task.

Related PRs:

Move shortcode content into processor docs and restructure into Overview and Setup sections for:
- sample
- sensitive_data_scanner
- split_array
- tag_control/logs
- throttle
@maycmlee maycmlee added the WORK IN PROGRESS No review needed, it's a wip ;) label Feb 13, 2026
@maycmlee maycmlee requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2026 23:25
@maycmlee maycmlee removed the WORK IN PROGRESS No review needed, it's a wip ;) label Feb 17, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@domalessi domalessi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same feedback here as your other PR: As long as the section header levels are as intended, then we're good to go!

@maycmlee maycmlee merged commit 3de92e3 into master Feb 18, 2026
16 checks passed
@maycmlee maycmlee deleted the may/move-processor-shortcodes-batch-3 branch February 18, 2026 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments