Skip to content

Conversation

@tpoliaw
Copy link
Contributor

@tpoliaw tpoliaw commented Jan 8, 2026

Version 1.1.407 had a bug (microsoft/pyright/issues/11060) in handling
pydantic models. Now 1.1.408 is available with a fix, we can exclude the
specific version and accept newer versions as they're released.

@tpoliaw tpoliaw requested a review from a team as a code owner January 8, 2026 11:05
@ZohebShaikh
Copy link
Contributor

Can scanspec PR be merged before this ?

Copy link
Contributor

@abbiemery abbiemery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The scanspec pr has now been merged (bluesky/scanspec#197)

Version 1.1.407 had a bug (microsoft/pyright/issues/11060) in handling
pydantic models. Now 1.1.408 is available with a fix, we can exclude the
specific version and accept newer versions as they're released.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.99%. Comparing base (ae766ca) to head (1a6aa46).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1329   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.99%   94.99%           
=======================================
  Files          42       42           
  Lines        2755     2755           
=======================================
  Hits         2617     2617           
  Misses        138      138           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tpoliaw
Copy link
Contributor Author

tpoliaw commented Jan 13, 2026

I'm guessing we can merge this without there being a scanspec release? The two version specifiers should be compatible, it'll just carry on choosing 1.1.406 until the new release?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants