Skip to content

Conversation

@4-FLOSS-Free-Libre-Open-Source-Software
Copy link
Contributor

prefetch-key for dnssec

prefetch-key for dnssec
Copy link
Collaborator

@ryru ryru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your suggestions!
Can you please elaborate what the benefits of the later two settings are?


prefetch: yes
prefetch-key: yes
target-fetch-policy: "-1 -1 -1 -1 -1"
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't quite understand the meaning of this setting. What is the benefit of setting it to "-1 -1 -1 -1 -1"?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this seems to remove limit on rule of how deep to go down with queries while prefetching

-1 == prefetch all

Recommended for enabling the latter:

If you enable it consider adding more numbers after the tar-get-fetch-policy to increase the max depth that is checked to.

prefetch-key: yes
target-fetch-policy: "-1 -1 -1 -1 -1"
qname-minimisation: yes
harden-referral-path: yes
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is experimental. I have no experience with this setting and feel a bit uncomfortable setting it.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice to have benefits:

enforces DNSSEC validation on nameserver NS sets and the nameserver addresses

according to documentation and as far i understand this, it must be safe. Because just generating some more queries and additional validation for and is only disabled because more queries can produce a bit more load

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants