Skip to content

feat/81501: Add Range filter for all date type filters#81897

Open
btkcodedev wants to merge 33 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
btkcodedev:btkcodedev/81501RangeUI
Open

feat/81501: Add Range filter for all date type filters#81897
btkcodedev wants to merge 33 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
btkcodedev:btkcodedev/81501RangeUI

Conversation

@btkcodedev
Copy link
Contributor

@btkcodedev btkcodedev commented Feb 9, 2026

Explanation of Change

Added a new Range date filter option with dual side-by-side calendars for easier date range selection across all search date filters (Date, Approved, Paid, Submitted, Withdrawn, Posted, Exported).

Key Improvements

  1. New Range Mode: Users can now select date ranges using two calendars displayed side-by-side (desktop) or stacked (mobile/sidebar)

  2. Two-Date Validation: Enforces that both From and To dates must be selected when using Range mode, preventing incomplete date ranges

  3. Consistent Display: Date ranges are now displayed as "Range: Jan 1, 2024 - Jan 31, 2024" entries in filter lists and titles

  4. Auto-Detection: When both After and Before dates exist on page load, it automatically switches to Range mode for better UX

  5. Responsive Layouts:

    • Desktop popup: Side-by-side calendars with 660px popover width
    • Sidebar filters: Vertically stacked calendars
    • Mobile: Vertically stacked with full-screen view
  6. Preserved Workflows: Individual After/Before editing still works when selected directly from menu items

Technical Changes

  • Added CONST.SEARCH.DATE_MODIFIERS.RANGE
  • Created new RangeDatePicker component with dual calendars
  • Enhanced DateFilterBase, DatePresetFilterBase, and DateSelectPopup to support Range mode
  • Updated display logic in AdvancedSearchFilters and SearchFiltersReportFieldPage
  • Added dynamic popover width support in DropdownButton

Fixed Issues

$ #81501
PROPOSAL: #81501 (comment)

Tests

Test Steps

Range Mode - Desktop Popup

  1. Navigate to reports and click on any date filter in the top filter bar
  2. Click on the "Range" option from the menu
  3. Verify two calendars appear side-by-side in the popover (width ~660px)
  4. Select a "From" date in the left calendar
  5. Select a "To" date in the right calendar
  6. Verify the range text appears below the calendars showing "Range: [date] - [date]"
  7. Click "Apply" and verify the filter bar shows "Range: [date] - [date]"

Range Mode - Sidebar Filters

  1. Navigate to Reports > Filters options from top bar
  2. Click on any date filter (Date, Approved, Paid, Submitted, Withdrawn, Posted, Exported)
  3. Click on the "Range" option from the menu
  4. Verify two calendars are stacked vertically and responsive (one above the other)
  5. Select dates in both calendars
  6. Verify the range text appears showing "Range: [date] - [date]"
  7. Click "Save" and "Apply results", verify with the range displayed matches the resulted items

Two-Date Validation

  1. Open any date filter and select "Range" mode
  2. Select only a "From" date (leave "To" empty)
  3. Click "Apply" or "Save"
  4. Verify an error message appears: "Please select dates for both From and To"
  5. Select a "To" date to complete the range
  6. Click "Apply" or "Save" and verify it saves successfully

Auto-Detection on Reload

  1. In the Top bar filters, select a date filter
  2. Click "After" and select a date (e.g., Jan 1, 2024)
  3. Click "Save" to go back to the filter list
  4. Click the same date filter again
  5. Click "Before" and select a date (e.g., Jan 31, 2024)
  6. Click "Save" and navigate away from the page
  7. Return to the date filter
  8. Verify it automatically opens in "Range" mode with both dates selected

Individual After/Before Editing

  1. Open any date filter
  2. Click "After" (not Range) and select a date
  3. Click "Save"
  4. Verify the filter displays as "After [date]" (not as Range)
  5. Re-open the filter and click "Before" (not Range)
  6. Select a date and verify "Before" option is still accessible
  7. Verify individual After/Before can still be set and edited separately

Mobile/Narrow Layout

  1. Resize browser to mobile width (<= 768px) or test on mobile device
  2. Click on any date filter
  3. Select "Range" option
  4. Verify calendars are stacked vertically in full-screen modal
  5. Verify range text appears at bottom center of modal
  6. Verify "Reset" and "Apply" buttons span full width at bottom
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

Design verification

Verify that the designs are as given in the issue section

Range Mode - Desktop Popup

  1. Navigate to reports and click on any date filter in the top filter bar
  2. Click on the "Range" option from the menu
  3. Verify two calendars appear side-by-side in the popover (width ~660px)
  4. Select a "From" date in the left calendar
  5. Select a "To" date in the right calendar
  6. Verify the range text appears below the calendars showing "Range: [date] - [date]"
  7. Click "Apply" and verify the filter bar shows "Range: [date] - [date]"

Range Mode - Sidebar Filters

  1. Navigate to Reports > Filters options from top bar
  2. Click on any date filter (Date, Approved, Paid, Submitted, Withdrawn, Posted, Exported)
  3. Click on the "Range" option from the menu
  4. Verify two calendars are stacked vertically and responsive (one above the other)
  5. Select dates in both calendars
  6. Verify the range text appears showing "Range: [date] - [date]"
  7. Click "Save" and "Apply results", verify with the range displayed matches the resulted items

Two-Date Validation

  1. Open any date filter and select "Range" mode
  2. Select only a "From" date (leave "To" empty)
  3. Click "Apply" or "Save"
  4. Verify an error message appears: "Please select dates for both From and To"
  5. Select a "To" date to complete the range
  6. Click "Apply" or "Save" and verify it saves successfully

Auto-Detection on Reload

  1. In the Top bar filters, select a date filter
  2. Click "After" and select a date (e.g., Jan 1, 2024)
  3. Click "Save" to go back to the filter list
  4. Click the same date filter again
  5. Click "Before" and select a date (e.g., Jan 31, 2024)
  6. Click "Save" and navigate away from the page
  7. Return to the date filter
  8. Verify it automatically opens in "Range" mode with both dates selected

Individual After/Before Editing

  1. Open any date filter
  2. Click "After" (not Range) and select a date
  3. Click "Save"
  4. Verify the filter displays as "After [date]" (not as Range)
  5. Re-open the filter and click "Before" (not Range)
  6. Select a date and verify "Before" option is still accessible
  7. Verify individual After/Before can still be set and edited separately

Mobile/Narrow Layout

  1. Resize browser to mobile width (<= 768px) or test on mobile device
  2. Click on any date filter
  3. Select "Range" option
  4. Verify calendars are stacked vertically in full-screen modal
  5. Verify range text appears at bottom center of modal
  6. Verify "Reset" and "Apply" buttons span full width at bottom
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen_Recording_20260209_234831_New.Expensify.Dev.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen_Recording_20260209_234141_Brave.mp4
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-02-09.at.11.30.23.PM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-02-09.at.11.34.04.PM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-02-10.at.12.04.47.AM.mov

@btkcodedev btkcodedev requested review from a team as code owners February 9, 2026 18:50
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Pujan92 and trjExpensify February 9, 2026 18:51
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed request for a team February 9, 2026 18:51
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 9, 2026

@Pujan92 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

// eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
}, [isSearchAdvancedFiltersFormLoading]);

useEffect(() => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PERF-10

Reasoning: Parent-child communication should not use useEffect. Instead, lift the state up to the parent component and pass it down as props. This follows React unidirectional data flow pattern, eliminates synchronization issues, reduces unnecessary renders, and makes the data flow clearer.

Suggested fix: Instead of calling onDateValuesChange in useEffect, call it directly when setDateValues is called in setDateValue:

const setDateValue = useCallback((dateModifier: SearchDateModifier, value: string | undefined) => {
    setDateValues((prevDateValues) => {
        const newDateValues = {...prevDateValues, [dateModifier]: value};
        // Update parent immediately with new values
        onDateValuesChange?.(newDateValues);
        return newDateValues;
    });
}, [onDateValuesChange]);

Then remove the useEffect entirely.


Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Working on it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed ✅

trjExpensify
trjExpensify previously approved these changes Feb 10, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks pretty good to me. CC: @Expensify/design @JmillsExpensify

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Feb 10, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@dannymcclain
Copy link
Contributor

Good to run a test build to check it out?

@btkcodedev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Approval for Spanish translation commented on Slack:
https://expensify.enterprise.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1770749508840719

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 10, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/CONST/index.ts 87.39% <ø> (ø)
...components/DatePicker/CalendarPicker/ArrowIcon.tsx 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/components/DatePicker/CalendarPicker/index.tsx 85.41% <100.00%> (+3.31%) ⬆️
src/libs/DateUtils.ts 67.80% <100.00%> (+0.78%) ⬆️
src/pages/Search/SearchPage.tsx 23.78% <100.00%> (+0.43%) ⬆️
src/types/form/SearchAdvancedFiltersForm.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...mponents/Search/FilterDropdowns/DropdownButton.tsx 92.85% <66.66%> (+0.26%) ⬆️
...nents/Search/SearchPageHeader/SearchFiltersBar.tsx 68.78% <97.05%> (+3.09%) ⬆️
src/hooks/useFilterFormValues.tsx 91.66% <66.66%> (-8.34%) ⬇️
...FiltersPage/SearchFiltersReportFieldPage/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 6 more
... and 102 files with indirect coverage changes

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

On mobile, seeing very large gaps below each calendar:
CleanShot 2026-02-12 at 09 06 07@2x

We also want everything left aligned, like so:
CleanShot 2026-02-12 at 09 07 23@2x

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

We can get rid of the marginTop:12 here:
CleanShot 2026-02-12 at 09 08 29@2x

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

There are some strange behaviors happening when you take these steps:

  • use Range to apply a range
  • before saving the filter, go to Before and choose a new date and hit apply
  • notice that the filter doesn't update
  • go to After and choose a date, this does update the filter
  • go back to Range and notice that it doesn't show a full range being set, but the second calendar has a green date button
CleanShot.2026-02-12.at.09.09.06.mp4

@btkcodedev
Copy link
Contributor Author

All the design issues have been addressed

Removed mt:12

image

Mobile view fixed

image

Addressed the inconsistency between the After, Before, and On filters.

  • However, I’d like your input on the current behavior.
    As per the implemented fix, when a user applies a range filter and then attempts to set an After, Before, or On filter, those filters will not take effect, since range and individual date filters cannot coexist.

  • Should we automatically remove the range filter in this scenario, or is the current logic acceptable?

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

I think all of the options for date are independent of one another. If you have a range set, but then you choose to just do an "On" or "After" or "Before" filter, the new filter would take precedent once you apply. They are all separate from one another.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Running a build now but you have a conflict.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @shawnborton has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Still feels broken, look how I can't save dates for Before/After/On:

CleanShot.2026-02-13.at.08.06.06.mp4

@btkcodedev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Working on it

@btkcodedev
Copy link
Contributor Author

All the addressed issues have been resolved. This should now be ready for approval.
Kindly review.

Screen.Recording.2026-02-13.at.11.16.32.PM.mov

@btkcodedev
Copy link
Contributor Author

All tests passed
CC: @Pujan92, @shawnborton, @trjExpensify

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @shawnborton has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Super minor but I think the width of these two buttons should match the calendar above:
CleanShot 2026-02-16 at 07 33 47@2x

From Figma:
CleanShot 2026-02-16 at 07 34 45@2x

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

When months have different amounts of week rows, I think I would expect both calendars to grow to the same height:
CleanShot 2026-02-16 at 07 35 24@2x

@btkcodedev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay will do, any other comments @Pujan92, @trjExpensify? I will do it in one shot

@Pujan92
Copy link
Contributor

Pujan92 commented Feb 16, 2026

Okay will do, any other comments @Pujan92, @trjExpensify? I will do it in one shot

I will do the code review tomorrow.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants