Remove security check

[gkorland]

Ref #56

PR Type

enhancement

---

Description

• Removed the security vulnerability scan step in the release workflow.

• Updated the Docker image build process to push images directly.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Enhancement	release-image.yml Removed security scan and streamlined image build                .github/workflows/release-image.yml Removed the Scan image for vulnerabilities step. Updated the Build image step to push images directly. Simplified the workflow by eliminating redundant steps. +0/-15

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Actions workflow for Docker image release
  • Modified image build and push configuration
  • Removed vulnerability scanning step from release process

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
code-graph-backend	🔄 Building (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 24, 2025 8:36am

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for image release, specifically the .github/workflows/release-image.yml file. The changes involve adjusting the Docker image build and push configuration, with a key modification switching the push parameter from false to true. This suggests a reconfiguration of how Docker images are built and potentially deployed during the release process.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/release-image.yml	- Removed image vulnerability scanning step using aquasecurity/trivy-action - Modified docker/build-push-action@v5 to set push: true - Simplified workflow configuration for Docker image release

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Release Rhyme 🐰

In workflows where images dance and spin,
Our config shifts, a new release begins
Push true, scan gone, simplicity's delight
Docker's dance now streamlined and bright
Code hops forward with jubilant glee! 🚀

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eafa8a8 and a8f4f29.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/release-image.yml (0 hunks)

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[qodo-code-review]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 Security concerns Security Scanning Removal: The PR removes the Trivy security scanner that was checking for CRITICAL and HIGH severity vulnerabilities in the Docker images. This means that vulnerable images could be pushed to production without any security validation, potentially exposing the system to known security vulnerabilities and exploits. The previous implementation would fail the workflow if serious vulnerabilities were found, which was an important security control.

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Security Risk Removing the vulnerability scanning step means that Docker images could be released with critical or high severity security vulnerabilities. This significantly increases the security risk of deployed containers. - name: Build image uses: docker/build-push-action@v5 with: context: . file: ./Dockerfile push: true tags: ${{ env.TAGS }}

[qodo-code-review]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Restore container security scanning step Reintroduce security scanning before pushing the Docker image to prevent deploying images with known vulnerabilities. .github/workflows/release-image.yml [31-37] - name: Build image uses: docker/build-push-action@v5 with: context: . file: ./Dockerfile + push: false + tags: ${{ env.TAGS }} + +- name: Scan image for vulnerabilities + uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@0.29.0 + with: + image-ref: ${{ env.TAGS }} + format: 'table' + exit-code: '1' + severity: 'CRITICAL,HIGH' + +- name: Push image + uses: docker/build-push-action@v5 + with: + context: . push: true tags: ${{ env.TAGS }} Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 Why: The suggestion addresses a critical security concern by reintroducing vulnerability scanning before pushing Docker images. Removing this step could allow compromised images to be deployed, posing significant security risks.	10