Staging #92
Staging #92
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughRefactors symbol handling by introducing a Symbol wrapper (node + resolved symbols), moves resolved-symbol storage into each Symbol, updates SourceAnalyzer to use resolved symbol IDs for graph edges (adding call metadata), and extends Graph.connect_entities to accept relationship properties. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Analyzer as SourceAnalyzer
participant Entity
participant Symbol
participant Graph
Analyzer->>Entity: fetch entity.symbols
loop for each symbolKey
Entity->>Symbol: access Symbol.node and Symbol.resolved_symbols
alt resolved_symbols non-empty
Symbol->>Graph: connect_entities(relation, src_id, resolved_id, properties)
Note right of Graph `#E6F2FF`: properties may include\nline number and decoded text for "call"
end
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here. PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
|
Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here. PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
|||||||||||
|
Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here. CI Feedback 🧐A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
api/graph.py (1)
482-498: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionFix mutable default argument in
connect_entitiesmethod.Using a mutable object (
{}) as a default argument value can lead to unexpected behavior because the default value is evaluated only once when the function is defined, not every time the function is called.Apply this change to fix the issue:
-def connect_entities(self, relation: str, src_id: int, dest_id: int, properties: dict = {}) -> None: +def connect_entities(self, relation: str, src_id: int, dest_id: int, properties: dict = None) -> None: """ Establish a relationship between src and dest Args: src_id (int): ID of the source node. dest_id (int): ID of the destination node. """ q = f"""MATCH (src), (dest) WHERE ID(src) = $src_id AND ID(dest) = $dest_id MERGE (src)-[e:{relation}]->(dest) SET e += $properties RETURN e""" - params = {'src_id': src_id, 'dest_id': dest_id, "properties": properties} + params = {'src_id': src_id, 'dest_id': dest_id, "properties": properties if properties is not None else {}} self._query(q, params)🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
482-482: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults
Replace with
None; initialize within function(B006)
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
api/analyzers/source_analyzer.py (1)
146-163: Enhance readability for the resolved symbol selection logic.The changes look good overall, with effective use of the new Symbol class and adding properties to relationships. However, selecting just the first resolved symbol with
next(iter(symbol.resolved_symbol))could use some explanation for future maintainers.Consider adding a comment to explain this pattern:
- resolved_symbol = next(iter(symbol.resolved_symbol)) + # Take the first resolved symbol - in our analyzer context, + # each symbol should resolve to at most one entity + resolved_symbol = next(iter(symbol.resolved_symbol))api/entities/entity.py (1)
4-10: Add docstrings to the new Symbol class.The introduction of the Symbol class is a great design choice that nicely encapsulates a symbol and its resolved counterparts.
Consider adding docstrings to improve code documentation:
class Symbol: + """ + Encapsulates a tree-sitter Node representing a symbol and its resolved symbols. + + A symbol is a reference to an entity in the codebase, such as a function or class name. + Resolved symbols are the actual entities that the symbol refers to. + """ def __init__(self, symbol: Node): + """ + Initialize a Symbol with a tree-sitter Node. + + Args: + symbol (Node): The tree-sitter Node representing the symbol. + """ self.symbol = symbol self.resolved_symbol = set() def add_resolve_symbol(self, resolved_symbol): + """ + Add a resolved symbol to this Symbol's set of resolved symbols. + + Args: + resolved_symbol: The resolved entity that this symbol refers to. + """ self.resolved_symbol.add(resolved_symbol)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
api/analyzers/source_analyzer.py(1 hunks)api/entities/entity.py(1 hunks)api/graph.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
api/graph.py
482-482: Do not use mutable data structures for argument defaults
Replace with None; initialize within function
(B006)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
api/entities/entity.py (3)
15-15: LGTM: Updated type annotation for symbols.The updated type annotation correctly reflects the change from a dictionary of Node lists to a dictionary of Symbol lists.
21-21: LGTM: Updated to use the new Symbol class.This correctly wraps the Node in a Symbol object before adding it to the list.
30-31: LGTM: Correctly integrates with the Symbol class.The code now properly passes the Node from the Symbol for resolution, then adds resolved symbols to the Symbol's collection.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Update deps and move to uv (vercel)
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| - name: Set up Python 3.10 | ||
| uses: actions/setup-python@v3 | ||
| - name: Install uv | ||
| uses: astral-sh/setup-uv@v4 |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action in workflow Medium
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Fix all issues with AI Agents
In @.github/workflows/python-app.yml:
- Around line 22-23: Update the GitHub Actions step named "Install uv" to pin
the astral-sh/setup-uv action to a specific commit SHA instead of the floating
tag; replace the uses value "astral-sh/setup-uv@v4" with
"astral-sh/setup-uv@<commit-sha>" where <commit-sha> is the full commit hash for
the v4 tag (obtainable via the repository API or git) so the workflow references
an immutable action version for supply-chain security.
In @pyproject.toml:
- Around line 29-30: pyproject.toml is missing the required [build-system] table
for PEP 517 compliance; add a [build-system] section that lists the build
requirements (e.g., "setuptools>=61.0" and "wheel") in requires and sets
build-backend to "setuptools.build_meta" so the project uses setuptools as the
PEP 517 backend, ensuring the file works alongside the existing
[tool.setuptools.packages.find] configuration.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockuv.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/python-app.ymlREADME.mdapi/llm.pypyproject.tomlrequirements.txt
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- requirements.txt
- api/llm.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
.github/workflows/python-app.yml
[warning] 23-23: Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action in workflow
Unpinned 3rd party Action 'Python application' step Uses Step uses 'astral-sh/setup-uv' with ref 'v4', not a pinned commit hash
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (1)
25-35: LGTM!The documentation updates correctly reflect the migration to UV for dependency management. The
uv syncanduv run flaskcommands are appropriate for the new tooling..github/workflows/python-app.yml (1)
28-31: LGTM!The dependency installation using
uv pip install --systemis appropriate for CI environments and correctly installs both linting tools and the project itself.pyproject.toml (1)
1-22: LGTM on the PEP 621 migration structure.The project metadata and dependency declarations follow modern PEP 621 conventions correctly. The version constraints are appropriately restrictive to avoid breaking changes.
| - name: Install uv | ||
| uses: astral-sh/setup-uv@v4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pin the action to a specific commit hash for supply chain security.
Using astral-sh/setup-uv@v4 with just a version tag allows the action maintainer to push changes that could affect your CI without your knowledge. Pinning to a specific commit hash provides better security.
🔎 Proposed fix
- name: Install uv
- uses: astral-sh/setup-uv@v4
+ uses: astral-sh/setup-uv@v4 # pin to commit hash after verifyingTo get the current commit hash for v4, run:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the latest commit hash for the v4 tag
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/astral-sh/setup-uv/git/refs/tags/v4 | jq -r '.object.sha'Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[warning] 23-23: Unpinned tag for a non-immutable Action in workflow
Unpinned 3rd party Action 'Python application' step Uses Step uses 'astral-sh/setup-uv' with ref 'v4', not a pinned commit hash
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @.github/workflows/python-app.yml around lines 22 - 23, Update the GitHub
Actions step named "Install uv" to pin the astral-sh/setup-uv action to a
specific commit SHA instead of the floating tag; replace the uses value
"astral-sh/setup-uv@v4" with "astral-sh/setup-uv@<commit-sha>" where
<commit-sha> is the full commit hash for the v4 tag (obtainable via the
repository API or git) so the workflow references an immutable action version
for supply-chain security.
| "tree-sitter-java>=0.23.5,<0.24.0", | ||
| "flask>=3.1.0,<4.0.0", | ||
| "python-dotenv>=1.0.1,<2.0.0", | ||
| "multilspy @ git+https://github.com/AviAvni/multilspy.git@python-init-params", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
VCS dependency on a branch is fragile.
Pointing to a Git branch (python-init-params) rather than a specific commit hash or tag means the dependency can change unexpectedly if the branch is rebased, force-pushed, or deleted. This can cause non-reproducible builds.
🔎 Proposed fix
Pin to a specific commit hash:
- "multilspy @ git+https://github.com/AviAvni/multilspy.git@python-init-params",
+ "multilspy @ git+https://github.com/AviAvni/multilspy.git@<commit-sha>",Replace <commit-sha> with the current HEAD of the branch:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the current commit hash of the python-init-params branch
git ls-remote https://github.com/AviAvni/multilspy.git refs/heads/python-init-params | cut -f1Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| [tool.setuptools.packages.find] | ||
| where = ["."] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing [build-system] section for PEP 517 compliance.
The [tool.setuptools.packages.find] configuration suggests setuptools is the intended build backend, but the required [build-system] table is missing. This may cause build/installation issues.
🔎 Proposed fix
Add the build-system section:
+[build-system]
+requires = ["setuptools>=61.0", "wheel"]
+build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
+
[tool.setuptools.packages.find]
where = ["."]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| [tool.setuptools.packages.find] | |
| where = ["."] | |
| [build-system] | |
| requires = ["setuptools>=61.0", "wheel"] | |
| build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta" | |
| [tool.setuptools.packages.find] | |
| where = ["."] |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @pyproject.toml around lines 29 - 30, pyproject.toml is missing the required
[build-system] table for PEP 517 compliance; add a [build-system] section that
lists the build requirements (e.g., "setuptools>=61.0" and "wheel") in requires
and sets build-backend to "setuptools.build_meta" so the project uses setuptools
as the PEP 517 backend, ensuring the file works alongside the existing
[tool.setuptools.packages.find] configuration.
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
Enhanced entity symbol resolution with new Symbol class
Added support for storing call line and text in graph relationships
Refactored entity relationship connection to accept properties
Improved handling of resolved symbols in analyzers and entities
Changes walkthrough 📝
entity.py
Refactor entity symbol handling with new Symbol classapi/entities/entity.py
resolutions
source_analyzer.py
Update analyzer for new symbol structure and call metadataapi/analyzers/source_analyzer.py
graph.py
Allow relationship properties in connect_entities methodapi/graph.py
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Documentation
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.