Fix NuGet include

[jjw24]

Fix so the packaged NuGet file gets published along with the release.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jjw24 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3bcd9f6 and 6822152.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/publish.yml (1 hunks)

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow file used for publishing. The branch trigger is modified to allow pushes from any branch instead of only the main branch. Additionally, commands have been added to print the current working directory and list the contents of the current directory. The path format for files in the "Publish GitHub releases" step has also been updated for Windows compatibility. No changes were made to any exported or public entities.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/publish.yml	Updated branch trigger from main to * (all branches), added commands to print current working directory and list contents, and updated file paths for Windows compatibility.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant WF as Publish Workflow
    Dev->>GH: Push changes (any branch)
    GH->>WF: Trigger workflow (.github/workflows/publish.yml)
    WF->>WF: Execute "pwd" command in Get Package Version step
    WF->>WF: List contents of current directory
    WF->>WF: Retrieve package version from DLL
    WF->>GH: Complete workflow execution
    GH->>Dev: Report status

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• Add GitHub Action #2: The changes in the main PR for the .github/workflows/publish.yml file, specifically regarding the creation and publishing of NuGet packages, are related to the changes in the retrieved PR that also involve creating a NuGet package in the .github/workflows/build.yml file.

Poem

In the code garden, I hop with glee,
Branch triggers widened for all to see.
A "pwd" command shows the path I tread,
As the workflow runs without dread.
I nibble on changes, light and free,
Hoping each commit brings joy to me! 🐇✨

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[Jack251970]

Why delete it? We should only allow publishing on main branch

[Jack251970]

Sorry, I misunderstood it. NVM.