Conversation
|
|
||
| green-river = stdenv.mkDerivation { | ||
| name = "green-river"; | ||
| buildInputs = [ openjdk sbt ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why openjdk, we use oracle one
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On production machines? From the very beginning we’ve been using OpenJDK on our developer machines, so it probably doesn’t matter as much, and it allows devs’ machines to stay in the non-proprietary land, for ones that care. :)
But it would be pretty easy to change. To use Oracle’s JVM, you’d have to change with import nixpkgs {} in L9 to with import nixpkgs { allowUnfree = true; } or similar.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, I meant on production and CI. I prefer to have same version on local just because the difference can introduce weird behaviors. Anyway, it's up to you, I just wanted to point at the difference in config
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mhm! OpenJDK and Oracle are almost the same, but @kjanosz would know more about that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Axblade we don't use any JDK at all, even seeders run via docker containers
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kpashka mesos/marathon are using oracle jdk as a runtime.
Also it's interesting that we use openjdk containers... So I was not actually right declaring that we use oracle one for phoenix/greenriver.
But it is inconsistent...
| targetPkgs = pkgs: (with pkgs; [ ansible2 curl dnsimple docker gnumake git google-cloud-sdk openssh python27Full python27Packages.libcloud python27Packages.pycrypto python27Packages.requests rsync ] ++ python27Packages.libcloud.propagatedBuildInputs ++ dnsimple.propagatedBuildInputs); | ||
| profile = '' | ||
| source .env.local; | ||
| export PYTHONPATH="/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That’s a fake/virtual path, NixOS doesn’t have /usr, but buildFHSUserEnv fakes that in nix-shell -A main for broken programs (in this case: Ansible).
michalrus
force-pushed
the
nix-shell-derivation
branch
from
75cdac1 to
8eda142
Compare
| in (buildFHSUserEnv { | ||
| name = "main"; | ||
| targetPkgs = pkgs: (with pkgs; [ ansible2 curl dnsimple docker gnumake git google-cloud-sdk openssh python27Full python27Packages.libcloud python27Packages.pycrypto python27Packages.requests rsync ] ++ python27Packages.libcloud.propagatedBuildInputs ++ dnsimple.propagatedBuildInputs); | ||
| targetPkgs = pkgs: (with pkgs; [ ansible2 curl dnsimple docker gnumake git google-cloud-sdk openssh python27Full python27Packages.libcloud python27Packages.pycrypto python27Packages.requests rsync ] ++ python27Packages.libcloud.propagatedBuildInputs ++ python27Packages.pycrypto.propagatedBuildInputs ++ dnsimple.propagatedBuildInputs); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kjanosz, IMO, there’s something wrong with this FHS creation, if you need to supply the deps twice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
WDYM? Where are they supplied first time?
EDIT:
ah, you've meant propagatedBuildInputs?
Yeah, was surprised, but couldn't get it working without it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes!
Both for pycrypto and libcloud.
4 participants
make prepareasks me for my root password, which is pretty insane.Here’s a PR with @kjanosz’s
default.nixthat set ups the environment, there was a branch but no PR.I pinned it to Nixpkgs 16.09 for greater reproducibility.
Example usage: