Skip to content

Conversation

@sijandh35
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #13861

Checklist

Reviewing is a process done by project maintainers, mostly on a volunteer basis. We try to keep the overhead as small as possible and appreciate if you help us to do so by completing the following items. Feel free to ask in a comment if you have troubles with any of them.

For all pull requests:

  • Confirm you have read the contribution guidelines
  • You have sent a Contribution Licence Agreement (CLA) as necessary (not required for small changes, e.g., fixing typos in the documentation)
  • Make sure the first PR targets the master branch, eventual backports will be managed later. This can be ignored if the PR is fixing an issue that only happens in a specific branch, but not in newer ones.

The following are required only for core and extension modules (they are welcomed, but not required, for contrib modules):

  • There is a ticket in https://github.com/GeoNode/geonode/issues describing the issue/improvement/feature (a notable exemption is, changes not visible to end-users)
  • The issue connected to the PR must have Labels and Milestone assigned
  • PR for bug fixes and small new features are presented as a single commit
  • PR title must be in the form "[Fixes #<issue_number>] Title of the PR"
  • New unit tests have been added covering the changes, unless there is an explanation on why the tests are not necessary/implemented

Submitting the PR does not require you to check all items, but by the time it gets merged, they should be either satisfied or inapplicable.

@sijandh35 sijandh35 self-assigned this Jan 9, 2026
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed CLA Bot: community license agreement signed label Jan 9, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @sijandh35, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly improves the robustness and user experience of the upsert functionality. It addresses a common pain point by adding timestamps to upserted asset names for better version tracking. Furthermore, it overhauls the error handling mechanisms, providing more granular and actionable feedback to users when upsert operations encounter issues, particularly during bulk data processing. These changes aim to make the upsert process more reliable and transparent.

Highlights

  • Improved Asset Naming for Upsert: When performing an UPSERT action, the generated asset name will now include a timestamp (YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM-SS) to help users easily identify the most recently uploaded file.
  • Enhanced Error Handling for Upsert Operations: The upsert process now provides more detailed error logging, especially for bulk save failures. Error logs will differentiate between feature-specific validation errors and general bulk save issues, with appropriate CSV formats for each.
  • Refined Transaction Management: The atomic transaction block in _commit_upsert has been adjusted to ensure that exceptions during bulk operations are caught and handled correctly, preventing partial commits and providing clearer error feedback.
  • Clearer Field Type Change Error Message: The error message displayed when a field's type changes during upsert validation has been made more user-friendly and informative.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces several valuable improvements to the Upsert functionality, focusing on enhancing error handling and user feedback. Key changes include adding a timestamp to upserted asset names for easier identification, improving the clarity of error messages, and implementing a more robust error handling mechanism for bulk save operations. The new logic correctly captures specific database errors during bulk_create, logs them to a user-accessible CSV file, and ensures transactional integrity with proper rollbacks. I have one suggestion to make the exception handling more specific, which will improve the robustness of the error handling. Overall, these changes significantly improve the stability and user-friendliness of the upsert process.

Comment on lines 1431 to 1437
except Exception as e:
error_message = str(e)
logger.exception("Error occurred during bulk upsert in upsert_data.")
raise UpsertException("An internal error occurred during upsert operation.")
# Store error message for handling outside transaction
exc = UpsertException(f"Bulk save failed: {error_message}")
exc.error_message = error_message
raise exc
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Catching a broad Exception can hide other programming errors. It's better to catch more specific exceptions that you expect from bulk_create, such as django.db.IntegrityError for database constraint violations or ValueError for data conversion issues. This makes the error handling more robust and prevents masking unexpected issues like a TypeError from being reported as a bulk save failure.

Suggested change
except Exception as e:
error_message = str(e)
logger.exception("Error occurred during bulk upsert in upsert_data.")
raise UpsertException("An internal error occurred during upsert operation.")
# Store error message for handling outside transaction
exc = UpsertException(f"Bulk save failed: {error_message}")
exc.error_message = error_message
raise exc
except (django.db.IntegrityError, ValueError) as e:
error_message = str(e)
logger.exception("Error occurred during bulk upsert in upsert_data.")
# Store error message for handling outside transaction
exc = UpsertException(f"Bulk save failed: {error_message}")
exc.error_message = error_message
raise exc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla-signed CLA Bot: community license agreement signed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improvements to Upsert

2 participants