Skip to content

Conversation

@carlospolop
Copy link
Collaborator

🤖 Automated Content Update

This PR was automatically generated by the HackTricks News Bot based on a technical blog post.

📝 Source Information

  • Blog URL: https://github.com/depthsecurity/RelayKing-Depth/
  • Blog Title: RelayKing v1.0
  • Suggested Section: Windows Hardening -> Active Directory Methodology (add/update NTLM Relay / EPA-CBT / LDAP signing guidance) and/or Pentesting Network -> Spoofing LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS/WPAD and Relay Attacks (tooling section: RelayKing for identifying relayable targets + coercion surface)

🎯 Content Summary

Title/Project
RelayKing v1.0 (repository: depthsecurity/RelayKing-Depth) is a comprehensive Active Directory NTLM relay detection + enumeration tool designed to identify actionable NTLM relay attack opportunities across common enterprise protocols and produce reports/outputs (including a curated target list) that can be fed into Impacket’s ntlmrelayx.py.

What RelayKing is for (offensive + defensive value)
RelayKing’s goal is ...

🔧 Technical Details

Relay opportunity discovery via protocol hardening checks: Enumerate enterprise services (SMB, HTTP/HTTPS, LDAP/LDAPS, MSSQL, RPC, etc.) and determine whether anti-relay controls are enforced. SMB checks include signing requirements (and are possible without auth per the tool). Web and directory protocols are evaluated for EPA/CBT (channel binding) and signing requirements; the tool notes that reliable HTTPS and LDAPS CBT checks typically require authenticated probing. A service is generally a better relay target when it accepts NTLM while not enforcing these protections.

Build end-to-end relay chains by combining “NTLM capture” with “relayable targets”: Identify coercion primitives (PetitPotam, PrinterBug, DFSCoerce; optionally detectable unauthenticated as described) that can force a victim machine/user to authenticate outward to an attacker-controlled listener. Then relay that inbound NTLM to a destination service previously verified as relayable (e.g., SMB wi...

🤖 Agent Actions

Summary:

  • Added a RelayKing section to the NTLM relay tooling page, outlining its relay exposure auditing capabilities (protocol EPA/CBT/signing checks, coercion/reflection detection, relay list generation) with practical usage examples and OPSEC cautions.
  • Extended references to include the RelayKing repository and accompanying blog post.

Files Modified:

  • src/generic-methodologies-and-resources/pentesting-network/spoofing-llmnr-nbt-ns-mdns-dns-and-wpad-and-relay-attacks.md

This PR was automatically created by the HackTricks Feed Bot. Please review the changes carefully before merging.

@carlospolop
Copy link
Collaborator Author

🔗 Additional Context

Original Blog Post: https://github.com/depthsecurity/RelayKing-Depth/

Content Categories: Based on the analysis, this content was categorized under "Windows Hardening -> Active Directory Methodology (add/update NTLM Relay / EPA-CBT / LDAP signing guidance) and/or Pentesting Network -> Spoofing LLMNR/NBT-NS/mDNS/WPAD and Relay Attacks (tooling section: RelayKing for identifying relayable targets + coercion surface)".

Repository Maintenance:

  • MD Files Formatting: 944 files processed

Review Notes:

  • This content was automatically processed and may require human review for accuracy
  • Check that the placement within the repository structure is appropriate
  • Verify that all technical details are correct and up-to-date
  • All .md files have been checked for proper formatting (headers, includes, etc.)

Bot Version: HackTricks News Bot v1.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants