-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
feat: add FilterService #169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @ChenZiHong-Gavin, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a new filtering capability to the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new FilterService to the data processing pipeline, allowing for filtering of data based on specified metrics. The implementation includes a RangeFilter model, a FilterService operator, and base classes for filters. The execution engine has been refactored to standardize on class-based operators, simplifying the logic for node execution. Additionally, the engine is now more robust, handling cases where a processing step results in an empty dataset.
My review focuses on improving robustness and code style. I've suggested a change to prevent potential KeyErrors in the FilterService and a minor style improvement to move an import to the top level. I also pointed out a missing newline in a shell script, which is a common best practice.
| meta_updates = {} | ||
|
|
||
| for item in batch: | ||
| value = item["metrics"].get(self.metric) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Directly accessing item['metrics'] can lead to a KeyError if an item in the batch is missing the 'metrics' key. To make the code more robust, it's better to use item.get('metrics', {}) to safely handle cases where the key might not be present.
| value = item["metrics"].get(self.metric) | |
| value = item.get("metrics", {}).get(self.metric) |
| method_params = filter_kwargs["method_params"] | ||
| self.metric = method_params["metric"] | ||
| if method == "range": | ||
| from graphgen.models import RangeFilter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This pull request introduces a new filtering capability to the graphgen framework, allowing users to define and apply custom filters within their data processing pipelines.