Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed a critical vulnerability where missing configuration resulted in full file system access. The server now defaults to the current working directory if no workspaces are explicitly allowed, and the internal validation logic now denies access by default if the configuration is empty.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 771577714099202422 started by @GhostTypes

Fixed a critical security vulnerability where the server allowed access to the entire file system if no `--allowed-workspace` arguments were provided.

Changes:
- Changed `validateAllowedPath` to throw an error if no workspaces are configured (fail secure).
- Updated CLI entry point to default to `process.cwd()` if no arguments are provided, maintaining usability while improving security.
- Updated tests to verify the new secure behavior.
- Added Sentinel journal entry.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@GhostTypes GhostTypes marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2026 23:01
@GhostTypes GhostTypes merged commit 0e02f8b into main Jan 20, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants