Skip to content

Conversation

@stevebux
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Context

Type of changes

  • Refactoring (non-breaking change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines
  • I have followed the code style of the project
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • This PR is a result of pair or mob programming

Sensitive Information Declaration

To ensure the utmost confidentiality and protect your and others privacy, we kindly ask you to NOT including PII (Personal Identifiable Information) / PID (Personal Identifiable Data) or any other sensitive data in this PR (Pull Request) and the codebase changes. We will remove any PR that do contain any sensitive information. We really appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

  • I confirm that neither PII/PID nor sensitive data are included in this PR and the codebase changes.

@stevebux stevebux requested review from a team as code owners November 25, 2025 15:51
@stevebux stevebux force-pushed the feature/CCM-12937 branch 4 times, most recently from 32e0f95 to df10891 Compare November 27, 2025 15:55
@stevebux
Copy link
Contributor Author

stevebux commented Dec 2, 2025

I've inserted an extra lambda (letter-stream-forwarder) in between the DynamoDB stream and the Kinesis stream - this seems to be the accepted way to connect DynamoDB to a Kinesis stream. The alternative would be to connect the DynamoDB stream directly to the letter-updates-transformer lambda, cut out Kinesis altogether

@stevebux stevebux force-pushed the feature/CCM-12937 branch 2 times, most recently from 9427ebe to 7a88838 Compare December 2, 2025 17:01
@stevebux stevebux requested a review from m-houston December 3, 2025 14:09
sidnhs
sidnhs previously approved these changes Dec 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@m-houston m-houston left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pending the supplierId field, all LGTM

m-houston
m-houston previously approved these changes Dec 4, 2025
@m-houston m-houston mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2025
10 tasks
@stevebux stevebux merged commit a32b943 into main Dec 11, 2025
34 checks passed
@stevebux stevebux deleted the feature/CCM-12937 branch December 11, 2025 10:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants