Skip to content

Conversation

@ced4rtree
Copy link
Contributor

Neither the standard nor mini base16 themes have support for transparency. The base16-pro-max theme by @y3owk1n does, though.

Fixes #1091

Sanity Checking

  • I have updated the changelog as per my changes
  • I have tested, and self-reviewed my code
  • My changes fit guidelines found in hacking nvf
  • Style and consistency
    • I ran Alejandra to format my code (nix fmt)
    • My code conforms to the editorconfig configuration of the project
    • My changes are consistent with the rest of the codebase
  • If new changes are particularly complex:
    • My code includes comments in particularly complex areas
    • I have added a section in the manual
    • (For breaking changes) I have included a migration guide
  • Package(s) built:
    • .#nix (default package)
    • .#maximal
    • .#docs-html (manual, must build)
    • .#docs-linkcheck (optional, please build if adding links)
  • Tested on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

The standard base16 theme does not have support for transparency. The
base16-pro-max theme by @y3owk1n does, though.
Update changelog to reflect new theme
@ced4rtree ced4rtree changed the title Feature/transparent base16 feat: add transparency supporting base16-pro-max theme Nov 23, 2025
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 23, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 23, 2025

🚀 Live preview deployed from d5efd7c

View it here:

Debug Information

Triggered by: ced4rtree

HEAD at: feature/transparent-base16

Reruns: 1627

@ced4rtree ced4rtree changed the base branch from main to v0.8 November 24, 2025 22:49
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2025
@ced4rtree ced4rtree requested a review from Soliprem November 27, 2025 20:44
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@Soliprem Soliprem left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM now. Thanks for the work!

@Soliprem
Copy link
Collaborator

CI shows a formatting issue. Did you run the formatter after making the adjustments?

@ced4rtree
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI shows a formatting issue. Did you run the formatter after making the adjustments?

This seems to be caused by the release notes added in #1246, and is present on the v0.8 branch at the moment

@Soliprem
Copy link
Collaborator

oh mb, thanks. Weird because I don't remember the CI complaining then... LGTM then. it's clearly unrelated

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

transparency not working with any base16-theme

2 participants