Skip to content

Conversation

@ioannisj
Copy link
Collaborator

@ioannisj ioannisj commented Dec 23, 2025

💡 Motivation and Context

Based on PostHog/posthog#43050 and PostHog/posthog-android#356
#skip-changelog

💚 How did you test it?

📝 Checklist

  • I reviewed the submitted code.
  • I added tests to verify the changes.
  • I updated the docs if needed.
  • No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.

@ioannisj ioannisj requested a review from a team as a code owner December 23, 2025 12:39
@ioannisj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Still WIP so no need to review yet. Can't change back to draft from mobile

@ioannisj ioannisj marked this pull request as draft December 29, 2025 08:48
@ioannisj ioannisj marked this pull request as ready for review December 29, 2025 18:32
buildSettings = {
ASSETCATALOG_COMPILER_APPICON_NAME = AppIcon;
ASSETCATALOG_COMPILER_GLOBAL_ACCENT_COLOR_NAME = AccentColor;
CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY = "";
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes avoid code signing when building on generic destinations

Copy link
Member

@pauldambra pauldambra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

very low context 🤣
might be worth asking @Piccirello too

Copy link
Member

@rafaeelaudibert rafaeelaudibert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI job makes sense to me, I don't understand the changes on Makefile tho

@ioannisj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CI job makes sense to me, I don't understand the changes on Makefile tho

The main change is removing xcodebuild -downloadAllPlatforms which downloads all runtimes and sdks.

CodeQL job was failing with low disk space. I guess because it's running on limited resources? But anw, the change should be beneficial for the other build workflows as well which are green as well.

Didn't touch any release-related scripts

@ioannisj ioannisj merged commit 1a3c22a into main Dec 30, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
@ioannisj ioannisj deleted the feat/codeql-advanced branch December 30, 2025 07:58
@Piccirello
Copy link
Contributor

This looks good, though the only thing it's missing is scanning of GitHub Actions. We previously got that with the default CodeQL setup, but no longer do. Could you add that back?

Piccirello added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2026
This was accidentally removed in #418.
Piccirello added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2026
This was accidentally removed in #418.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants