Skip to content

[MRG] Test Jax version in backend#794

Merged
rflamary merged 2 commits intoPythonOT:masterfrom
clbonet:version_jax
Feb 11, 2026
Merged

[MRG] Test Jax version in backend#794
rflamary merged 2 commits intoPythonOT:masterfrom
clbonet:version_jax

Conversation

@clbonet
Copy link
Contributor

@clbonet clbonet commented Feb 11, 2026

Types of changes

This PR fixes the test in the backend requiring that jax version must be more recent than "0.4.24".

Motivation and context / Related issue

Jax changed their numerotation of versions from "0.9.0" to "0.9.0.1", see https://github.com/jax-ml/jax/releases .

How has this been tested (if it applies)

PR checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • The documentation is up-to-date with the changes I made (check build artifacts).
  • All tests passed, and additional code has been covered with new tests.
  • I have added the PR and Issue fix to the RELEASES.md file.

@clbonet clbonet changed the title Test Jax version in backend [MRG] Test Jax version in backend Feb 11, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.76%. Comparing base (3ee4386) to head (a603a0d).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #794   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.76%   96.76%           
=======================================
  Files         107      107           
  Lines       22249    22249           
=======================================
  Hits        21529    21529           
  Misses        720      720           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@rflamary rflamary merged commit 5c92598 into PythonOT:master Feb 11, 2026
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants