Skip to content

Conversation

@ChuanN-sudo
Copy link
Contributor

@ChuanN-sudo ChuanN-sudo commented Nov 16, 2025

拉取/合并请求描述:(PR description)

Relates to #10895

为什么提交这份PR (why to submit this PR)

Add standardized documentation for Mailbox Test

你的解决方案是什么 (what is your solution)

请提供验证的bsp和config (provide the config and bsp)

  • BSP:

  • .config:

  • action:

]

当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR

必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):

  • 本拉取/合并请求是一个草稿版本 This PR is for a code-review and is intended to get feedback
  • 本拉取/合并请求是一个成熟版本 This PR is mature, and ready to be integrated into the repo

代码质量 Code Quality:

我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:

  • 已经仔细查看过代码改动的对比 Already check the difference between PR and old code
  • 代码风格正确,包括缩进空格,命名及其他风格 Style guide is adhered to, including spacing, naming and other styles
  • 没有垃圾代码,代码尽量精简,不包含#if 0代码,不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up
  • 所有变更均有原因及合理的,并且不会影响到其他软件组件代码或BSP All modifications are justified and not affect other components or BSP
  • 对难懂代码均提供对应的注释 I've commented appropriately where code is tricky
  • 代码是高质量的 Code in this PR is of high quality
  • 已经使用formatting 等源码格式化工具确保格式符合RT-Thread代码规范 This PR complies with RT-Thread code specification
  • 如果是新增bsp, 已经添加ci检查到.github/ALL_BSP_COMPILE.json 详细请参考链接BSP自查

@github-actions
Copy link

👋 感谢您对 RT-Thread 的贡献!Thank you for your contribution to RT-Thread!

为确保代码符合 RT-Thread 的编码规范,请在你的仓库中执行以下步骤运行代码格式化工作流(如果格式化CI运行失败)。
To ensure your code complies with RT-Thread's coding style, please run the code formatting workflow by following the steps below (If the formatting of CI fails to run).


🛠 操作步骤 | Steps

  1. 前往 Actions 页面 | Go to the Actions page
    点击进入工作流 → | Click to open workflow →

  2. 点击 Run workflow | Click Run workflow

  • 设置需排除的文件/目录(目录请以"/"结尾)
    Set files/directories to exclude (directories should end with "/")
  • 将目标分支设置为 \ Set the target branch to:add-mailbox-tc-comments
  • 设置PR number为 \ Set the PR number to:10939
  1. 等待工作流完成 | Wait for the workflow to complete
    格式化后的代码将自动推送至你的分支。
    The formatted code will be automatically pushed to your branch.

完成后,提交将自动更新至 add-mailbox-tc-comments 分支,关联的 Pull Request 也会同步更新。
Once completed, commits will be pushed to the add-mailbox-tc-comments branch automatically, and the related Pull Request will be updated.

如有问题欢迎联系我们,再次感谢您的贡献!💐
If you have any questions, feel free to reach out. Thanks again for your contribution!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Kernel PR has src relate code label Nov 16, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 16, 2025

📌 Code Review Assignment

🏷️ Tag: kernel

Reviewers: GorrayLi ReviewSun hamburger-os lianux-mm wdfk-prog xu18838022837

Changed Files (Click to expand)
  • src/utest/mailbox_tc.c

📊 Current Review Status (Last Updated: 2025-11-21 17:38 CST)

  • GorrayLi Pending Review
  • ReviewSun Pending Review
  • hamburger-os Pending Review
  • lianux-mm Pending Review
  • wdfk-prog Pending Review
  • xu18838022837 Pending Review

📝 Review Instructions

  1. 维护者可以通过单击此处来刷新审查状态: 🔄 刷新状态
    Maintainers can refresh the review status by clicking here: 🔄 Refresh Status

  2. 确认审核通过后评论 LGTM/lgtm
    Comment LGTM/lgtm after confirming approval

  3. PR合并前需至少一位维护者确认
    PR must be confirmed by at least one maintainer before merging

ℹ️ 刷新CI状态操作需要具备仓库写入权限。
ℹ️ Refresh CI status operation requires repository Write permission.

@ChuanN-sudo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Rbb666 老师,自动检查通过了,麻烦您审核一下

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds comprehensive standardized documentation for the RT-Thread mailbox unit test. The documentation follows a structured format to describe test objectives, scenarios, verification metrics, dependencies, and expected results.

Key Changes

  • Added detailed test case documentation block with test objectives, scenarios, and verification metrics
  • Documented mailbox API coverage and testing approach
  • Specified hardware/software dependencies and expected test results

* Date Author Notes
* 2021-09-08 liukang the first version
* 2023-09-15 xqyjlj change stack size in cpu64
* 2025-11-16 ChuanN-sudo add standardized utest documentation block
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 PR Title Format Issue / PR 标题格式问题

English: PR title should follow the format: [module][subsystem] Description using lowercase brackets, not parentheses.

Current title: docs(utest):Add standardized documentation for Mailbox Test

Suggested title: [utest][mailbox] add standardized documentation for mailbox test

中文: PR 标题应遵循格式:使用小写方括号的 [模块][子系统] 描述,而不是圆括号。

当前标题: docs(utest):Add standardized documentation for Mailbox Test

建议标题: [utest][mailbox] add standardized documentation for mailbox test

Copilot generated this review using guidance from repository custom instructions.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

已修改

* Test Case Name: IPC Mailbox Test
*
* Test Objectives:
* - Validate mailbox core functionality under different scheduling policies amd allocation methods.
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Spelling Error / 拼写错误

English: There is a typo in "amd" which should be "and".

Current: different scheduling policies amd allocation methods
Corrected: different scheduling policies and allocation methods

中文: "amd" 应为 "and"。

当前: different scheduling policies amd allocation methods
更正: different scheduling policies and allocation methods

Suggested change
* - Validate mailbox core functionality under different scheduling policies amd allocation methods.
* - Validate mailbox core functionality under different scheduling policies and allocation methods.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

已修改

* - All mailbox initialization and creation operations return RT_EOK status.
* - Mailbox detachment and deletion operations complete successfully without resource leaks.
* - Sent messages are correctly received with preserved content integrity.
* - Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values..
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Spelling/Formatting Error / 拼写/格式错误

English: There is an extra period at the end of the line creating a double period.

Current: Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values..
Corrected: Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values.

中文: 行尾有多余的句点,形成了双句点。

当前: Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values..
更正: Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values.

Suggested change
* - Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values..
* - Send-wait operations are verified to respect specified timeout values.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

已修改

@ChuanN-sudo ChuanN-sudo changed the title docs(utest):Add standardized documentation for Mailbox Test [utest][mailbox]: add standardized documentation for mailbox test Nov 21, 2025
Signed-off-by: ChuanN-sudo <fjchuanil@gmail.com>
@ChuanN-sudo ChuanN-sudo force-pushed the add-mailbox-tc-comments branch from e350c66 to 3893385 Compare November 21, 2025 09:38
@Rbb666 Rbb666 merged commit af6e310 into RT-Thread:master Nov 23, 2025
57 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Kernel PR has src relate code

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants