-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
bsp: cvitek: c906_little: fix building warnings #9953
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When building bsp/cvitek/c906_little, compiler warns:
```
board/board.c: In function 'rt_hw_board_init':
board/board.c:26:5: warning: implicit declaration of
function 'rt_hw_tick_init'; did you mean 'rt_hw_stack_init'?
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
26 | rt_hw_tick_init();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| rt_hw_stack_init
board/board.c:29:5: warning: implicit declaration of
function 'rt_hw_uart_init'; did you mean 'rt_hw_board_init'?
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
29 | rt_hw_uart_init();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| rt_hw_board_init
```
To remove these build warnings, include header files
which declare these functions.
Plus, remove the decalartion of `tick_isr()`, this
function does not exist.
Signed-off-by: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@outlook.com>
When building bsp/cvitek/c906_little, compiler warns:
```
.../rt-thread/libcpu/risc-v/common/trap_common.c:
In function 'rt_hw_interrupt_install':
.../rt-thread/libcpu/risc-v/common/trap_common.c:50:11:
warning: unused variable 'user_param' [-Wunused-variable]
50 | void *user_param = param;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
.../rt-thread/libcpu/risc-v/common/trap_common.c:
In function 'rt_rv32_system_irq_handler':
.../rt-thread/libcpu/risc-v/common/trap_common.c:77:25:
warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
77 | s_stack_frame = (rt_hw_stack_frame_t *)mscratch;
| ^
```
Fixed these warnings as per indication from gcc.
Signed-off-by: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@outlook.com>
When building bsp/cvitek/c906_little, compiler reports:
```
.../rt-thread/libcpu/risc-v/rv64/trap.c:
In function 'handle_trap':
.../rt-thread/libcpu/risc-v/rv64/trap.c:106:13:
warning: implicit declaration of function 'rt_hw_tick_isr';
did you mean 'rt_hw_stack_init'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
106 | rt_hw_tick_isr();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| rt_hw_stack_init
.../rt-thread/libcpu/risc-v/rv64/trap.c:110:13:
warning: implicit declaration of function 'rt_hw_irq_isr';
did you mean 'rt_hw_soft_irq_isr'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
110 | rt_hw_irq_isr();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
| rt_hw_soft_irq_isr
```
rt_hw_tick_isr()/rt_hw_irq_isr() are implemented by bsp, but
libcpu/risc-v/rv64 doesn't declare them, so compiler warns.
There are three BSPs using 'rv64' (libcpu/risc-v/rv64):
- `bsp/cvitek/c906_little/rtconfig.py`
- `bsp/juicevm/rtconfig.py`
- `bsp/k210/rtconfig.py`
`handle_trap` in `libcpu/risc-v/rv64` is defined as weak.
BSP can use this function directly or define and overload
it by itself.
If bsp use this function directly, bsp need to pay
attention to the fact that three functions will be called
in this function:
- `rt_hw_soft_irq_isr`
- `rt_hw_tick_isr`
- `rt_hw_irq_isr`
In `libcpu/risc-v/rv64`, `rt_hw_soft_irq_isr` has a weak
definition, while the other two do not. This means that
if the bsp does not overload `handle_trap`, bsp must
define `rt_hw_tick_isr` and `rt_hw_irq_isr` itself.
This is also the practice of `bsp/cvitek/c906_little`.
There is also a similar bsp `bsp/k210`, and the form of
`bsp/juicevm` implements `handle_trap` by itself.
It seems that `rt_hw_tick_isr` and `rt_hw_irq_isr` are
not required to be implemented by all BSPs using
`libcpu/risc-v/rv64`. The premise for BSP to implement
them is that it does not overload `handle_trap`. So
declaring `rt_hw_tick_isr` and `rt_hw_irq_isr` with
extern in `libcpu/risc-v/rv64` is not proper.
In addition, the `rt_hw_tick_isr/rt_hw_irq_isr` are only
used by `libcpu/risc-v/rv64`, so it is not worth putting
the declaration in `./include/rthw.h`.
Sum up, the best solution is to add weak definition to
`rt_hw_tick_isr/rt_hw_irq_isr` as existing `rt_hw_soft_irq_isr`.
Signed-off-by: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@outlook.com>
10 tasks
BernardXiong
approved these changes
Jan 29, 2025
mysterywolf
approved these changes
Jan 30, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixed: #8977
本 PR 继续 #9865 的工作。
因为告警涉及三个模块,所以本 PR 包括了三个 commit,具体每个 patch 的改动请看每个 commit 的 message。
拉取/合并请求描述:(PR description)
[
为什么提交这份PR (why to submit this PR)
你的解决方案是什么 (what is your solution)
请提供验证的bsp和config (provide the config and bsp)
]
当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR
必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):
代码质量 Code Quality:
我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:
#if 0代码,不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up