-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Unit tests #82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Unit tests #82
Conversation
|
Do not merge until previous ones have been merged! |
dae0ece to
d08437a
Compare
|
@arnabcs17b006 same question here ? |
|
Yes.. It is relevant
…On Thu, Aug 20, 2020, 04:37 Mathieu Tarral ***@***.***> wrote:
@arnabcs17b006 <https://github.com/arnabcs17b006> same question here ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#82 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALGMDC5ZGNQLMANLOT3RMNLSBRLLFANCNFSM4OEQPDLQ>
.
|
|
Then I think you need a rebase too |
ae797c1 to
819f58e
Compare
|
You should not change anything in the existing tests. They are fine as there are right now. Even worse, your changes to them are causing runtime errors. |
|
Looks like you have not addressed any comments from my previous review. |
819f58e to
a809d41
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #82 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 16.73% 69.09% +52.35%
===========================================
Files 5 5
Lines 472 990 +518
Branches 65 104 +39
===========================================
+ Hits 79 684 +605
+ Misses 382 219 -163
- Partials 11 87 +76
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
a809d41 to
32187f0
Compare
6501bc4 to
327a40d
Compare
1f01abb to
f790ce9
Compare
d4e3fd9 to
dec56ae
Compare
src/driver/kvm.rs
Outdated
| ) | ||
| .times(1) | ||
| .returning(|_, _, _| Ok(())); | ||
| kvmi_mock |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Wenzel is it logically possible for toggling pagefault interception on to fail if called a second time?
03ecf33 to
2947879
Compare
2947879 to
51d3d67
Compare
Do not merge until previous ones are merged!