feat: enhance security (TLS), standardization (JSON Schema), and performance (uvloop)#721
feat: enhance security (TLS), standardization (JSON Schema), and performance (uvloop)#721Fankouzu wants to merge 1 commit intoa2aproject:mainfrom
Conversation
…tion, and uvloop optimization
Summary of ChangesHello @Fankouzu, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly upgrades the A2A Python SDK by integrating critical features that enhance its security, robustness, and performance. It introduces a comprehensive TLS/SSL configuration system to secure agent-to-agent communication, implements JSON Schema validation for strict protocol message compliance, and provides optional Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces significant and valuable enhancements to the A2A Python SDK, focusing on security with TLS/SSL support, performance via uvloop integration, and robustness through JSON Schema validation. The new modules (tls.py, performance.py, validation.py) are well-structured and the integration into the client configuration and factories is clean.
My review has identified a few areas for improvement:
- In
src/a2a/client/tls.py, the SSL context creation can be modernized to use newer, non-deprecated APIs for setting the minimum TLS version. - In
src/a2a/validation.py, there is some duplicated code in thevalidate_requestandvalidate_responsefunctions that should be removed. - Also in
validate_request, the error reporting can be improved to provide more context when validation fails.
Overall, this is a great set of changes that significantly improves the SDK's capabilities. Addressing these minor points will further enhance the code quality.
|
|
||
| errors: list[dict[str, Any]] = [] | ||
|
|
||
| for model_type in request_types: | ||
| try: | ||
| return validate_message(data, model_type, strict=False) | ||
| except ValidationError: | ||
| continue | ||
|
|
||
| raise ValidationError( | ||
| 'Data does not match any known A2A request type', | ||
| errors=errors, | ||
| instance=data, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This block of code is a duplicate of the preceding block (lines 255-267). This redundant code should be removed.
|
|
||
| for model_type in response_types: | ||
| try: | ||
| return validate_message(data, model_type, strict=False) | ||
| except ValidationError: | ||
| continue | ||
|
|
||
| raise ValidationError( | ||
| 'Data does not match any known A2A response type', | ||
| instance=data, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This block of code is a duplicate of the preceding block (lines 305-314). This redundant code should be removed.
| protocol_map = { | ||
| 'TLSv1_2': ssl.PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2, | ||
| 'TLSv1_3': ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENT, | ||
| } | ||
| protocol = protocol_map.get(self.min_version, ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENT) | ||
|
|
||
| context = ssl.SSLContext(protocol) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current implementation for setting the TLS protocol version uses a map with deprecated constants like ssl.PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2. A more modern and clearer approach for Python 3.10+ is to use ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENT and set the minimum_version on the SSL context. This improves security configurability and code clarity.
| protocol_map = { | |
| 'TLSv1_2': ssl.PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2, | |
| 'TLSv1_3': ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENT, | |
| } | |
| protocol = protocol_map.get(self.min_version, ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENT) | |
| context = ssl.SSLContext(protocol) | |
| context = ssl.SSLContext(ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_CLIENT) | |
| version_map = { | |
| 'TLSv1_2': ssl.TLSVersion.TLSv1_2, | |
| 'TLSv1_3': ssl.TLSVersion.TLSv1_3, | |
| } | |
| if min_version_enum := version_map.get(self.min_version): | |
| context.minimum_version = min_version_enum |
| protocol_map = { | ||
| 'TLSv1_2': ssl.PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2, | ||
| 'TLSv1_3': ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER, | ||
| } | ||
| protocol = protocol_map.get(min_version, ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER) | ||
|
|
||
| context = ssl.SSLContext(protocol) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to create_ssl_context, this function uses a protocol map with deprecated constants. It's better to use ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER and configure minimum_version for better clarity and to align with modern Python ssl module practices.
| protocol_map = { | |
| 'TLSv1_2': ssl.PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2, | |
| 'TLSv1_3': ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER, | |
| } | |
| protocol = protocol_map.get(min_version, ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER) | |
| context = ssl.SSLContext(protocol) | |
| context = ssl.SSLContext(ssl.PROTOCOL_TLS_SERVER) | |
| version_map = { | |
| 'TLSv1_2': ssl.TLSVersion.TLSv1_2, | |
| 'TLSv1_3': ssl.TLSVersion.TLSv1_3, | |
| } | |
| if min_version_enum := version_map.get(min_version): | |
| context.minimum_version = min_version_enum |
| for model_type in request_types: | ||
| try: | ||
| return validate_message(data, model_type, strict=False) | ||
| except ValidationError: | ||
| continue |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When validation against a specific model_type fails, the ValidationError is caught, but no information about the failure is collected. The errors list remains empty, which makes the final ValidationError less helpful for debugging. It would be beneficial to collect details about why each validation failed.
| for model_type in request_types: | |
| try: | |
| return validate_message(data, model_type, strict=False) | |
| except ValidationError: | |
| continue | |
| for model_type in request_types: | |
| try: | |
| return validate_message(data, model_type, strict=False) | |
| except ValidationError as e: | |
| errors.append({'type': model_type.__name__, 'message': str(e), 'details': e.errors}) | |
| continue |
1 participant
This PR introduces significant enhancements to the A2A Python SDK to improve security, robustness, and performance.
Key features: