-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
GH-586: Override fixedSizeBinary method for UnionMapWriter #885
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d1036a1
GH-586: Override fixedSizeBinary method for UnionMapWriter
axreldable a21fbd1
GH-586: Implement a separate unit test for FixedSizeBinaryWriter
axreldable 7504493
GH-586: Implement a separate unit test for FixedSizeBinaryWriter
axreldable e52ccb8
GH-586: Introduce fixedSizeBinary(int byteWidth) + fix test
axreldable ba7e938
GH-586: Use only maps in the testFixedSizeBinaryWriter
axreldable 91e1b6a
GH-586: Use only maps in the testFixedSizeBinaryWriter
axreldable 298f018
GH-586: Add unit test for first time key and value initialization
axreldable File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose it technically works but I find it very confusing to recycle the test, especially since the map value was always BigInt before. I'd rather see a new test that exercises both the key/value paths explicitly and is explicitly marked as a regression test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lidavidm , thank you for looking into it! Sorry for the confusion. Let me introduce a separate unit test.
--
Could you please clarify what do you mean by
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lidavidm , I've implemented a separate unit test for
fixedSizeBinary.However, I came across an issue. When I call
writer.key().fixedSizeBinary()for the first time, it fails with NPE, as it falls back toNullableStructWriterwhich requires writer to be not-null (checkout thetestFixedSizeBinaryWriterInitializationErrortest).It work when I first initialize writers for both
keyandvaluefields with other writes, e.g.bigInt(checkouttestFixedSizeBinaryWritertest).Could you help me here? What would be the right way to initialize writes for
keyandvaluefields for theUnionMapWriter?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lidavidm , I introduced
public FixedSizeBinaryWriter fixedSizeBinary(int byteWidth)in theUnionMapWriterwhich supposed to be used for initialization of the key and value writers. I’d really appreciate your feedback if there’s a better approach.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I'm rather behind - I will try to review this soon but I can't make any promises right now