migrate ArrowTypes code that depends on Sockets and UUIDs to extensions

[baumgold]

Also add support for Sockets.InetAddr

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.23810% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 87.25%. Comparing base (ac199b0) to head (57eb717).
⚠️ Report is 35 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/ArrowTypes/ext/ArrowTypesSocketsExt.jl	93.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #500      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.34%   87.25%   -0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          26       28       +2     
  Lines        3288     3280       -8     
==========================================
- Hits         2872     2862      -10     
- Misses        416      418       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ericphanson]

What happens if a table was serialized with one of these objects, but now you're loading it in a session in which e.g. UUIDs isn't loaded? I think this is probably breaking, unfortunately, since before you'd get back UUID types, whereas now you have to change your code to load UUIDs to get it.

[baumgold]

What happens if a table was serialized with one of these objects, but now you're loading it in a session in which e.g. UUIDs isn't loaded? I think this is probably breaking, unfortunately, since before you'd get back UUID types, whereas now you have to change your code to load UUIDs to get it.

That's a valid point, thanks for bringing it up. Do you think it's worth continuing with this change but bump major rather than minor? Or should we abandon this change for now?

[ericphanson]

These are pretty light packages, and are in the sysimage anyway until v1.11, so to me it doesn’t feel worth all the compat bumps it will cause. I think it’s worth waiting until there’s other reasons for a breaking change, or some big reason why having them is causing problems.

[baumgold]

Sounds good. I'll put this PR on hold for now. Thanks for the feedback.

[omus]

Why not keep the existing Julia version compat and do this instead? https://pkgdocs.julialang.org/v1/creating-packages/#Transition-from-normal-dependency-to-extension