server: add options for kvm.guest.os.machine.type#12414
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.22 #12414 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 17.59% 17.59%
- Complexity 15596 15600 +4
=========================================
Files 5910 5910
Lines 529755 529756 +1
Branches 64724 64724
=========================================
+ Hits 93218 93228 +10
+ Misses 426045 426036 -9
Partials 10492 10492
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
cc @rajujith @DaanHoogland @nvazquez |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@rajujith a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 16373 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
nvazquez
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM - thanks @weizhouapache @rajujith
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16375 |
|
@weizhouapache The option added is passed to KVM but its not useful in my use case yet due to incorrect controller type set for q35 machine type:
rootDiskController=scsi |
|
LGTM |
@rajujith I've added a new issue based on your comment #12535. I think we merge this PR as it is intended to add the setting only. |


Description
This PR fixes an issue that there is no option for kvm guest os machine type in the dropdown on UI
the setting was introduced by #11569
Thanks @rajujith reporting the issue
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?