-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
chore(deps): Update sqlparser to 0.60 #19672
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Could we address the CI failures? Looks like some tests are failing |
Signed-off-by: StandingMan <jmtangcs@gmail.com>
0ea9df1 to
c2dd55b
Compare
Signed-off-by: StandingMan <jmtangcs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: StandingMan <jmtangcs@gmail.com>
|
@Jefffrey ready to review. |
|
I was literally about to sit down and have codex try to do this -- thank you @Standing-Man -- taking a look now |
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me @Standing-Man -- thank you. THe only question I have is about the change of API to use Boxed results
| pub enum RelationPlanning { | ||
| /// The relation was successfully planned by an extension planner | ||
| Planned(PlannedRelation), | ||
| Planned(Box<PlannedRelation>), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this API changed?
I think this is a breaking API change, so there should be a good reason for doing so
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Without this breaking API change, the Clippy check would warn with clippy::large-enum-variant, indicating that the entire enum is at least 624 bytes.
Signed-off-by: StandingMan <jmtangcs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: StandingMan <jmtangcs@gmail.com>
alamb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @Standing-Man and @Jefffrey
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?