Skip to content

[fix](filecache) reset_range dose not update shadow queue causing lar…#60554

Open
freemandealer wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-4.0from
freemandealer:pick-4.0-59314
Open

[fix](filecache) reset_range dose not update shadow queue causing lar…#60554
freemandealer wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-4.0from
freemandealer:pick-4.0-59314

Conversation

@freemandealer
Copy link
Contributor

…ge cache size pick#59314

pick #59314
shadown queue is copying the actual LRU queue and provide lockless acess. but the copying loses updating size wh en actual LRU queue is reseting range (when load data, we first allocate 1MB block for the data and reset the size t o the real size when finalizing).
This commit does the following to fix this problem:

  1. update the corresponding shadow queue element when resetting
  2. calibrate size during initial loading into memory process

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

…ge cache size pick#59314

pick apache#59314
shadown queue is copying the actual LRU queue and provide lockless acess. but the copying loses updating size wh
en actual LRU queue is reseting range (when load data, we first allocate 1MB block for the data and reset the size t
o the real size when finalizing).
This commit does the following to fix this problem:
1. update the corresponding shadow queue element when resetting
2. calibrate size during initial loading into memory process

Signed-off-by: zhengyu <zhangzhengyu@selectdb.com>
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented Feb 5, 2026

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@freemandealer
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants