Skip to content

Conversation

@koenvo
Copy link
Contributor

@koenvo koenvo commented Apr 9, 2025

Potential fix for #1804

Might want to write a test, but not sure yet how to reproduce without using glue.

Closes #1804

Copy link
Contributor

@Fokko Fokko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left one comment, but apart from that it looks good to me 👍

@Fokko Fokko added this to the PyIceberg 0.9.1 milestone Apr 9, 2025
@koenvo koenvo marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2025 22:26
@Fokko Fokko merged commit 1588701 into apache:main Apr 9, 2025
7 checks passed
@Fokko
Copy link
Contributor

Fokko commented Apr 9, 2025

Thanks @koenvo for fixing this 🙌

@koenvo koenvo deleted the bugfix/tmp-fix-pyarrow-46057 branch April 9, 2025 22:37
Fokko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
Potential fix for #1804

Might want to write a test, but not sure yet how to reproduce without
using glue.

Closes #1804
gabeiglio pushed a commit to Netflix/iceberg-python that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2025
Potential fix for apache#1804

Might want to write a test, but not sure yet how to reproduce without
using glue.

Closes apache#1804
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Glue scan with filter throws list index out of range

2 participants