Skip to content

Conversation

@Fokko
Copy link
Contributor

@Fokko Fokko commented Oct 10, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Got fixed upstream apache/iceberg-python#2591

What changes are included in this PR?

Are these changes tested?

@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024 merged commit 39812f8 into apache:main Oct 10, 2025
16 checks passed
@liurenjie1024
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @Fokko for this fix!

@Fokko Fokko deleted the fd-lock-pydantic branch October 11, 2025 14:15
@kevinjqliu kevinjqliu mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2025
Xuanwo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2025
## Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes #123` indicates that this PR will close issue #123.
-->

- Closes #.

## What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
Provide a summary of the modifications in this PR. List the main changes
such as new features, bug fixes, refactoring, or any other updates.
-->
Revert of #1737
pydantic release a fix in 2.12.3 which will be automatically used by
resolver (see simliar in pyiceberg,
apache/iceberg-python#2635)

## Are these changes tested?

<!--
Specify what test covers (unit test, integration test, etc.).

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: Python binding test failed in ci.

2 participants