Skip to content

Conversation

@TorstenDittmann
Copy link
Contributor

@TorstenDittmann TorstenDittmann commented Feb 2, 2026

What does this PR do?

Moving to cursor pagination when fetching all threads.

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved thread data pagination handling for enhanced performance and efficiency when retrieving large thread collections.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Walkthrough

The iterateAllThreads function in src/routes/threads/helpers.ts transitions from offset-based pagination to cursor-based pagination. The function now maintains a cursor (tracking the last item ID) and a count variable instead of manually incrementing an offset. Query construction is dynamic, incorporating a limit and optional cursorAfter parameter. The iteration yields each thread, increments the count, and terminates early when the specified total is reached, replacing the previous offset progression and total-based break logic.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: implementing cursor-based pagination in the iterateAllThreads function, which aligns with the file modifications.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-threads-use-cursor-pagination

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/routes/threads/helpers.ts (1)

124-149: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Handle total = 0 before fetching.

With total = 0, the generator still fetches and yields at least one thread before returning. If callers can pass 0, consider an early return.

✅ Suggested fix
 export async function* iterateAllThreads(total: number | undefined = undefined) {
     const limit = 100;
     let cursor: string | undefined = undefined;
     let count = 0;
+    if (total !== undefined && total <= 0) {
+        return;
+    }
     while (true) {
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@src/routes/threads/helpers.ts`:
- Around line 124-138: iterateAllThreads currently paginates without a
deterministic order, causing unstable cursor pagination; update the query set in
iterateAllThreads to include an explicit ordering (e.g.,
Query.orderAsc('$sequence') for monotonic insertion order) before calling
databases.listDocuments, ensuring the same ordering is applied when you pass a
cursor so pages are stable and no duplicates/skip occur; also apply the same
explicit order change to the other pagination site in this file (compare with
getThreads which uses Query.orderDesc('$createdAt')) so both methods use a
consistent, deterministic order.

@TorstenDittmann TorstenDittmann merged commit c643954 into main Feb 2, 2026
6 checks passed
@TorstenDittmann TorstenDittmann deleted the fix-threads-use-cursor-pagination branch February 2, 2026 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants